and exactly a place to be going where we don t need. so i m not sure where that s coming from that s an interesting point because i think the other debater tonight will take the opposite that this is exactly where he wants to be. this is exactly why he did this with president obama. it s why he played with race during his election. and now the idea that don jr. says, well, i didn t know she was half indian. that s how you express that kind of surprise is with millions of people on twitter. do you buy it? what s it about to you? it s a plausible deniability. we don t have to say accidents don t happen. you always intended for the thing that occurred to occur. so the reality is the following. that, yes, we know that it was intentional, even if inadvertent. we know he wants to play with race. we know these are birther claims. and the best way to do it, throw rocks, hide your hands. pretend that you didn t intend this.
we know he wants to play with race. and the best way to do it, throw rocks, hide your hands. this is not the kind of nastiness. but they keep doing it. they keep repeating it. this is a constant reoccurring theme with the president, implied racism. i m not a racist, i don t have a racist bone in my body, but those muscles are awful bigoted. we have to come to grips that the far right has used this to their advantage, and then when they get caught with it, they claim they didn t want dessert. this is feeding and fueling a nasty, vicious, anti-black sentiment in this country that continues from the white house on down. i agree with the central part of your premise.
could not see through with our adversaries would hide behind them and use that to assault our agents like throw rocks or just hide lots of people then at one time run across. so would this line the border quick. this design right there is what we are looking at going forward. and then with the terrain? so we are trying to track them. for a regular person to see it is very difficult but the dog can cover the ground fast and efficiently he will cover a lot more ground in a very short period of time then we could.
could not see through with our adversaries would hide behind them and use that to assault our agents like throw rocks or just hide lots of people then at one time run across. so would this line the border quick. this design right there is what we are looking at going forward. and then with the terrain? so we are trying to track them. for a regular person to see it is very difficult but the dog can cover the ground fast and efficiently he will cover a lot more ground in a very short period of time then we could.
yeah, there were children in the caravan, we know that. the president has admitted it. they admit tear gas was used. put two and two together and you get four, whatever. the president says we should welcome a review of what happened, no one wants this to happen to cbp. i do not believe that cbp agents woke up that morning wanting to use tear gas on women and children. it was a crisis created by rhetoric and policy from this administration that put them in a position that they didn t need to be in. and i think it s worthy of a review that mexico is asking. is there any defense for using tear gas on children? first and foremost the tear gas was not deployed at the children, the tear gas was deployed to disburse the crowd. the children were being used as human shields so these grown males could stand behind them and throw rocks. i have worked groups in the desert.