carbon. that got struck down today. it s complicated, the plan wasn t really even in place and for a bunch of reasons and it s not even really worth getting into the courts reasoning, because the courts reasoning is so pretextual as to be ludicrous. it s sort of a waste of time to run it down. here is the reason that six conservative justices wanted to make it hard for the epa to regulate carbon, to weaken the power of the administration state. the reasoning is they had six votes. it s the reason when you are with a group of people, deciding where to go to dinner, you know if six people go, want to go there, and three don t, that s three. that s you don t issue an opinion. you go there because you have the votes. that s what the court is. we saw something similar to the court s recent ruling, making it harder for states to keep guns off the streets. and of course, when the court overturned 50 years of precedent to end the federal right to an abortion, that s it.
state of georgia, some stop from the atlanta journal constitutional now. this is back in atlanta, things have possibly gotten more like this. i was pretty struck, this was about that 2019 2020 law that kemp signed, do you support or oppose that law going into effect? support, 37.9%, oppose 53.9%, don t know eight. would you like to see the supreme court overturned its roe v. wade decision or not. yes, overturn roe v. wade, 23.9. no 68%. those are really striking majorities in a state that is very much a 50/50 state, as we all know. absolutely, that was one of the reasons this decision was both perplexing and so dangerous. it goes against the will of the people. but this is part of a national trend that we are seeing with this devolution of constitutional rights, to states that have pledged not to abide by those constitutional rights. that is why governor kemp is so dangerous to georgia, he s
and it s not even really worth getting into the courts reasoning, because the courts reasoning is so pretextual as to be ludicrous. it s sort of a waste of time to run it down. here is the reason that six conservative justices wanted to make it hard for the epa to regulate carbon, to weaken the power of the administration state. the reasoning is they had six votes. it s the reason when you are with a group of people, deciding where to go to dinner, you know if six people go, want to go there, and three don t, that s three. that s you don t issue an opinion. you go there because you have the votes. that s what the court is. we saw something similar to the court s recent ruling, making it harder for states to keep guns off the streets. and of course, when the court overturned 50 years of precedent to end the federal right to an abortion, that s it. they have the votes, they can
The House of the False Lama theatlantic.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from theatlantic.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.