he was asked a specific question about syria and gave a two sentence answer and answered the question and kind of punted and followed immediately by marco rubio i thought gave a very detailed and thoughtful answer and by carly fiorina, another outsider not sitting on the senate intelligence committee who also gave a detailed thou t thoughtful answer. by comparison he didn t look as good as they did on those issues and details. let s go to carly. i put out the question on my twitter feed. a lot of people think it was a big night for her. brit humes suggested as much. he has a good political eye. what are your thoughts? i think this is like when people say rubio had a good night last time around. carly is this person in narrow political debate terms won the debate. i m not sure whether that makes a lot of difference on the ground in iowa and new
the different groups involved. he was asked a specific question about syria and gave a two sentence answer and answered the question and kind of punted and followed immediately by marco rubio i thought gave a very detailed and thoughtful answer and by carly fiorina, another outsider not sitting on the senate intelligence committee who also gave a detailed thou t thoughtful answer. by comparison he didn t look as good as they did on those issues and details. let s go to carly. i put out the question on my twitter feed. a lot of people think it was a big night for her. brit humes suggested as much. he has a good political eye. what are your thoughts? i think this is like when people say rubio had a good night last time around. carly is this person in narrow political debate terms won the debate. i m not sure whether that makes a lot of difference on the ground in iowa and new
esexecive d m e ke le somodyti bwhes is ec case l m l aomy asl aomfoable bille tartsfole new ll hamhire andarichin aewamre dhi a neva. mi emael lurev sw0 minu smima l ago stomowow we hav nusatiolgo conv sati thamo we lav sft ba tards theio udgenvti ha and w wt s he wteba hou t isdshe wiing ge giv and d w wai not wou swiing wig ge.iv d itai aotearso be wig t g it rya arsbe tudge the hseyaith6gerilln i he hh cu. eres a dlllhapi ipn ecuenat tha es mig dpi eveaathaig4 trlionnutshe nexea fr4 ars.tr onn wh doesthe predentex pt o f e taen s. hwhoeerentpeec and p o ta doe hecnd oe ge a nber? he a ga nr? pting hen foxns.coabou png thi s dxncoou mhi gng to s doude u.s portbut ghere t wou no.slan on rtt horeto w aieve n than
scathing rebukes from several 9. take a listen. i would guess )(wxd night, however people of your category givet( high-fives, you re talki to other academicsxd about this cute argument thatq has been utilized, but i would say to you that i think you ve undermined the credibilityt(ó[ oft( this administration. we re going to talk to y!9 senator corkerfá later this hou t( theés d?ocratic superpc going up on the air this mornin a+++d attack republicans for their vote to overhaul medicare.q