he emerged today, of course, refusing to take any questionse to defend his department s actions. visa v former president.ia my role is completelysp consistenteak on with regulatios that set forth the responsibilities of , e attorney general underco the special counsel regulations, and i followed thos te regulations. lau look, let sra be very clear here. the issue is are you acting in good faith or? are you part of a political operation to get a conviction 81% mp by any means necessary? 81% of republicans believeof reb about all you know. this is all about politics and protecting one of the more destructivvee presidentsha the united states has ever had. joe biden. and they rjoe bide e now consider the situation this way. no one believes that merrick garland would still be a a.g. if he didn t hadn t greenlitlig a special prosecutor. this case, everyone at msnbc and cnn believes that garland tu is trying to put trump in jailt. no matter where the facts lead. otherwise they
i ve laid out a clear foreign upicy vision that calls for the russia china alliance. but yes, that would involv e offn uk some sacrifices in ukraine. these are beyonthesd the pal this is outside of the overton window, even in the establishmene over t of the republican party. and so i do think that there s somethin g going on in the country, laura, where the real distinction is not even between republicans and democrats right now. it s between thosrightw.e whe unapologetically pro-american. i call itunapol a more of a national i call myself a nationalist, not in a way that s suppose, noy it supd to e inflammatory. by a nationalist, i mean, i stand for the ideals of this i and i will not apologize for them. and then an anti nationaliste f think an anti-american streak in our country that wishes to apologizen our is for a natin founded on our ideals. and i think both exist in both parties. that s the real divide more than republicans, : we a democrats. well, vivek, we re really