We bring you an exclusive interview with jpmorgans jamie dimon. Set, the former ecb director of operations, and google on whether Central Banks have learned. Later, we bring you a weekly brexit show what is next gekko we will talk to the director general about why he concluded that britain would be better outside the eu. First thing is first come in is sebastian with the first word news. Politics mapping out and plans. Economists in the Bloomberg Survey have raised their growth estimates to 6. 6 from a month earlier. That is stimulus and a stronger global demand. Asahi is in talks to purchase a telly on actelion. Representatives did not immediately respond to requests for comments. Secretary general has applauded Donald Trumps choice of secretary of state. Anaid Rex Tillerson is outstanding oil technocrat. High expectations around the world, he is deeply there is ale, and very thin line between oil, geopolitics, so i congratulate president elect donald trump for making such an excellen
Very destructiveness of those weapons that predicted the deterrence of great power war since 1945. Why . Great power landlords had been the scourge of eurasia for 34 years before the United States dropped atomic weapons. Wars that it can to have killed tens of millions on the battlefield and tens of millions more through disease and political upheaval. Seventy years ago most responsible people expected a third world war to follow the 1st and 2nd with consequences far worse. Thankfully that war never came and to misuse the title from a famous book it has led many people to proclaim thank god for the atom bomb. A Nuclear Weapons prevent world war iii and do these weapons have the intended effect of stabilizing World Politics but making great power war unthinkable . This powerful notion is that the foundation of what we have come to call deterrent. Our deterrent. Our whole way of thinking about Nuclear Weapons is centered around this concept much of policy has been driven by the fact that
This land is my land, from california, to the New York Island sunday afternoon at 2 00 on American History tv on cspan3. Congress continues on its twoweek recess, several members are traveling. Nancy pelosi is in cambodia with a bipartisan delegation of members. The delegation visited the halo trust facility in cambodia. The delegation will travel to vietnam, korea and japan. John boehner is in the middle east. He met with iraqs prime minister. The speaker will travel to israel later this week. A press release says he and a delegation as the deadline approaches tonight for an Iranian Nuclear agreement, we present a discussion about Nuclear Weapons, National Security and the future of the bomb. Posted by the Panel Discussion for the Southern Methodist University Tower center for Political Studies and includes a former commander of u. S. Strategic command. Good evening. Welcome to smu and the special forum on Nuclear Weapons. Welcome also to the security and Strategy Program here at smu.
But there are lots of arguments. The one interesting surprise that we point out in the historical record is that the United States went to great lengths, greater lengths than we perhaps realized in the past, to keep its friends and allies nonnuclear van itd even its enemies. Countries ranging from west germany to japan to south korea and australia, italy and sweden, the list goes on and on. In fact, issued a willingness to work with its adversary, the soviet union, against its allies to accomplish it. The third important question is an age old one how much is enough . In other words, what are the fourth and strategy requirements for Nuclear Deterrence . And are they different than the requirement for assuring allies . Can a state achieve meaningful nuclear superiority, and if so, what are the benefits of achieving such privacy . This is a comics question, but during the cold war, there were two leading views. Many of the academic and think tank analyst, renowned thinkers like bernard b
It clear that a particular practice is ok going on in the future. It means, well, this is what theyve done they have done, so were not going to go back and revisit it. Just like were not going to go back and take the cross out of every city seal thats been there since, you know, 1800. But it doesnt mean that it would be ok to adopt a seal today that would have a cross in it, does it . Not necessarily. But i think history is clearly important to the establishment clause analysis under this courts precedence in two it clear that a particular practice is ok going on in the future. It means, well, this is what theyve done they have done, significant respects, both of which apply here, one of which might not apply in your with respect to your hypothetical. The first being the history shows us that the practice of legislative prayer, just like the motto, has not, in fact, led to an establishment and, therefore, we can be confident it is not in danger of doing so. And secondly, the history of