hair, and a wide open heart. she is a very, very kind of person. and then she vanished. i called the police. something is wrong. and something was. days passed, then months. no leads, no clues. no progress. i thought, i m not going to put up with this. we have to get going. get moving on this. enter the a team. a band of tough guy private eyes. this guy has something to hide. they had a brief encounter with the mysterious stranger. and that train coming home, she had met this woman. did that hold the answer? she is talking about how someone has tried to assume her identity. a chilling case of a daughter in danger. somebody was after them. welcome to dateline, i am lester holt. she was beautiful, talented, trusted and sometimes troubled, a young woman from a prominent family finally grabbing the promise in life, right up until the day that she vanished, and when the police seemed unable to find her, her family hatched a plan but an unusual str
Punishment clause governs which punishments are permitted. Not what conctan be prohibited. Second, n precedent supports the ninth circuit rule. Instead they misread robinson to bar any punishment for involuntary conduct lketo a status. But robinlls only that states cannot outlaw the status of drug addiction. It made clear they can phibit conduct like drug use could this court should not rewrite robinson six decades later thir the ninth circuits approachroven unworkable. The eighth amendment does not tell courts o is involuntarily homesswhat shelter is adequate, or wme, place and manner relations are allowed. T in 35 suits and countin federal courts are now deciding everything from the exact size of campsites to the adequacy of empty beds at specic shelters like the Gospel Rescue Mission rants pass. Ancies are struggling to apply arbitrary shifting stdards in the field. Thisourt should reverse and and the failed experiment which s eled the spread of encampments while harming those it pu
First, the cruel and unusual punime clause governs which punishments are permitted. Not what conduct can be prohibited. Second, no precedent spos the ninth circuit rule. Instead they misread robinson to bar any punishment for involuntary conduct linked to a status. But robinson tells on tt states cannot outlaw the status of drug addiction. It made clear they can prohibit conduct like drug use could this court should not rew robinson six decadesat third, the ninth circuits approach has proven woable. The eighth amendment does not tell courts who is involuntarily homeless, what slt is adequate, or what time, ple and manner relations are allowe but in 35 suits and counting feral cous are now deciding everything from the ect size of campsites to the adequacy of empty beds at specific shelters like the Gospel Rescue Mission in grants and cities aretrgling to apply arbitrary shifting standards t field. This court sulreverse and and the failed eerent which has fueled t sead of encampmentshile
First, the cruel and unusual punishment clause governs which punishments are permitted. Not what conduct can be prohibited. Second, no precedent supports the ninth ciuirule. Instead they misread robinson to bar any punishment for inluntary conduct linked to a status. But robinson tells only that states cannot outlaw the stu of drug addiction. It made clea can prohibit conduct like drug us could ts court should not rewrite robinson sixeces later third,heinth circuits approach has proven unworkable. The eighth amendment does not tell courts who is involuntarily homeless, what shelter is adequate, or what time, place and manner relations are allowed. But in 35 suits and counting federal courts areeciding everything from the exact size ofampsites to the adequacy of empty beds at specific shelters the Gospel Rescue Mission in grants pass. And cities are struggling to apply arbitrary shifting standards in the field. This court should reverse and and the failed experiment which has fueled the
Almost individua fed a suit where a District Court ruled they were cruel and unusual punishment because theha no access to shelter. On appeal, the u. S. Urof appeals for the ninth circuit also ruled in favor of the Homeless People. The u. S. Supreme court now has through june of 2024 to issue a ruling. First, the cruel andal punishment claverns which punishments are permitted. T what conduct can be ibited. Second, no precedent supports the ninth circuit rule. Instead they misobinson to bar any punishment for involuntary conduct linked to a. States cnot outlaw the status of drug addiction. It made clear they can prohibit uct like drug use could this court should not rewrite robinson six decades later third, the ninth circuits approach has proven unworkable the eighth andnt does not tell courts who is involuntarily homeless, what shelter is equate, or what time, place and manner relations are allowed. But in 35 suits and counting federal courts are now deciding everything from the exact