Specifically the bail system before arrangement is unconstitutional thats why my office filed papers in Supreme Court well not defend that law we are innovate taking issue with the law but about the existing bail process prior to the point of arrangement at arrangement a judge has the opportunity to review the circumstances and make an individual bail determination based on all the facts a bail schedule that lists the price of freedom without consideration of the individual circumstances is not serving the interest of the government or the public and unfairly discriminates against the poor Government Entities in other states tackle the problem in lawsuits like alabama, kansas, missouri and mississippi and louisiana have reformed their action but my action is the first time that a Government Entity has refused to dangerous people need to remain incarcerated how much money someone has is not picture measure of the 245e9 right now we have a system that someone can be locked up for days be
Specifically the bail system before arrangement is unconstitutional thats why my office filed papers in Supreme Court well not defend that law we are innovate taking issue with the law but about the existing bail process prior to the point of arrangement at arrangement a judge has the opportunity to review the circumstances and make an individual bail determination based on all the facts a bail schedule that lists the price of freedom without consideration of the individual circumstances is not serving the interest of the government or the public and unfairly discriminates against the poor Government Entities in other states tackle the problem in lawsuits like alabama, kansas, missouri and mississippi and louisiana have reformed their action but my action is the first time that a Government Entity has refused to dangerous people need to remain incarcerated how much money someone has is not picture measure of the 245e9 right now we have a system that someone can be locked up for days be
Good evening and welcome to the wednesday, november 16, 2016, of the San Francisco board of appeals guidelines that he commissioner swig that he commissioner bobby wilson to my left is thomas owen for legal advice this evening at the controls is gary the boards legal assistant director. Were joined by representatives from the city departments that have cases before this board. At the table in front is corey teague the assistant Zoning Administrator and representing the Planning Department and Planning Commission that he joined by joe duffy dbi chris buck urban forester and with the bureau of street use and mapping and deputy City Attorney ann pierson representing of the department of Health Please be advised the ringing of and use of cell phones and other Electronic Devices are prohibited. Out in the hallway. Permit holders and others have up to 7 minutes to present their case and 3 minutes for rebuttal. People affiliated with these parties must conclude their comments within 7 minutes
Administrator and representing the Planning Department and Planning Commission that he joined by joe duffy dbi chris buck urban forester and with the bureau of street use and mapping and deputy City Attorney ann pierson representing of the department of Health Please be advised the ringing of and use of cell phones and other Electronic Devices are prohibited. Out in the hallway. Permit holders and others have up to 7 minutes to present their case and 3 minutes for rebuttal. People affiliated with these parties must conclude their comments within 7 minutes, participants not affiliated have up to 3 minutes no rebuttal. To assist the board in the accurate preparation of the minutes, members of the public are asked, not required to submit a speaker card or Business Card to the clerk. The board welcomes your comments. There are Customer Satisfaction forms available. If you have a question about the schedule, speak to the staff after the meeting or call the board office tomorrow we are locat