To come in . Because, you know, trump says that he wants the troops home from afghanistan by christmas, and biden has been a bit more nuanced about his position on afghanistan. You know that the military ballots could turn over the margins you just talked about. It depends upon the number of military ballots that there are. I dont know how many military ballots there are from pennsylvania, and i doubt that there are more than 46000. 00 ballots. So you agree with james baker that trump certainly shouldnt have called a halt to voting in a, in a democracy. Oh, of course not. Why would we halt the voting simply because in a democracy the president doesnt call doesnt halt the voting. And the court doesnt hold the body, not under these circumstances. Now, the supreme or the u. S. Supreme court did order, and that ballots that received after november served which was the use shoe that was brought to the or now before that, this will, the election should be segregated and preserved, which they
You can usually find witnesses in any election. Theres some alleged irregularities. Elections are big, messy businesses. The issue is whether there is credible evidence of either on the radio, larry, sure, or that of sufficient magnitude to change the results of the election. So the fact that you come up with 2 or 3 people who say something, but look right now, doesnt mean that the election is going to be overturned. If that were the case, wed never have anybody like hes saying what youre saying. Partly because the margins a so different this time till what they were in 2000 when you won for george w. Bush against al gore. Well, there are good big differences. Thats one that margin in pennsylvania was over 46000 votes, so you would have to be able to walk into court with credible evidence that there were well in 46000 ballots. The validity in which part in question i havent even seen anybody come in with a 100 pieces of evidence of a florida regularity. A 2nd in 2000, the problem was o
James suzman, his groundbreaking, new book and work history of how we spend our time examines the history of the universe and humanity to ask if the key to tackling not just the future of work. But everything from pandemics to wars to inequality, lies in our affluent hunter gatherer. A past all the more coming up in todays going underground, but 1st as the 2020 u. S. Election appears to still be the subject of litigation. Lets go straight to Award Winning lawyer. Barry richard who represented george w. Bush in the florida litigation. Thats all al gore beaten in 2000. He joins me now via skype from tallahassee in florida. Barry, thanks so much for coming on. Is joe biden, the president elect . Yes it is. Thats an easy question. Well, russia, china, they still waiting on it. What makes you so sure that the u. S. Attorney general bill barr is wrong about investigating voting irregularities at the election that well, im not suggesting hes wrong about investigating irregularities. Nothing i
Hour of the 11th day of the 11th month. While the likely pick for pentagon, Michele Flournoy stresses the need for the usa to become a force to be reckoned with. Coming up on the show, there will be a smooth transition to a 2nd trumpet ministration. Right. Took us 37. 00 plus days, you know, watching back in 2000 conducted a Successful Transition then did the corporate funded Networks Call it too early . As u. S. Attorney general bill barr authorizes federal prosecutors to investigate allegations of voting irregularities in last weeks president ial election. We speak to barry richard, the more who helped win george bushs legal fight against al gore in 2000. And this coronavirus lockdowns on the robot revolution forced us to ask questions about the very ways we live and work and apologist james suzman, whose groundbreaking new book and work a history of how we spend our time, examines the history of the universe and humanity to ask if the key to tackling not just the future of work, but
Questions that may arise. And so with that, we want to begin some brief questioning by the members of the panel, and its my pleasure to recognize first representative bobby scott of virginia. Thank you, mr. Chairman. As i said in my hoping comments, most of the comments, virtually all of the comments are based on the mathematical curiosity that the Electoral College and popular vote may not agree. If you are counting electoral votes and thats what you count, like in the world series you can get outscored and still win. We heard a lot about the swing states. If one thing about a swing state is it assumes that you have in the bag enough to get close to 270 and so you are going to spend your time on the last couple of states. Just like if a president is trying to get a bill passed, when you get close to 218 in the house, a handful of members get all the attention. 51 senators, you get up to 46, 47, those last few senators will get all the attention. But that assumes that you have in the b