which is unbelievable, because you you ear bud to listen to the tv, so you don t wake up the one next to you while you re doing it. plus it is voice controlled. what is better than that? did you unwrap maybe a telephone or got a new phone or got a tablet. here is is a great consideration. the world s thinnest lightest ear buds, t-2, wireless ear buds. just won the innovation award honor efor upcoming ces in las vegas. thinnest, lightest. incredible breakthrough ear buds, just gorgeous and super thin. you absolutely love them. they are about$0. really good. they will rock the market in 2022. easy bluetooth pairing. this game pass what to do, one
kyrsten sinema has been unequivocal that that s not going to work for her. here s a little bit of her speech. eliminating the 60-vote threshold on a party line with the thinnest of possibly majorities to pass these bills that i support will not guarantee that we prevent demagogues from winning office. eliminating the 60-vote threshold will simply guarantee that we lose a critical tool that we need to safeguard our democracy from threats in the years to come. so, given all this, given this backdrop, what is chuck schumer s next move? hallie, democrats are on the verge of a major defeat on voting rights sledge legislation after senator sinema took to the floor of the chamber and put a dagger in this effort. she said she supports those bills, but as a practical matter that has no meaning because she s unwilling to change the rules. they will be filibustered. they will die.
you and the president are speaking the same language and sending, signaling the very same thoughts right now. with regard to this. let me ask you about the moderate democratic senator, kyrsten sinema. she says she supports voting rights legislation but she will not budge on her intent to preserve the senate filibuster. she has once again defended her stance. she s take an lot of heat for it. let s take a listen to what she said. eliminating the 60-vote threshold on a party line with the thinnest of possible majorities, to pass these bills that i support will not guarantee that we prevent demagogues from winning office. eliminating the 60-vote threshold will simply guarantee that we lose a critical tool that we need to safeguard our democracy from threats in the years to come. that last part in particular, what are your thoughts on this?
court justice tragically passed away. this time ruth bader ginsburg. her death also came during an election year. but this time, the election was not nine months away. it was 45 days away, literally. and senator mitch mcconnell decided, yeah, all that stuff i decided about not confirming a justice in an election year, you can forget that. he proceeded to rush through the nomination of amy coney barrett at record speed. it took 27 days from tip to tail. and that, of course, is a glaring example of senator mcconnell s hypocrisy and duplicity, i m sorry to have to say that way. but it s also a precedent. and democrats said today, upon the announced retirement of justice stephen breyer that they want to confirm justice breyer s confirmation just as quickly as amy coney barrett s. meaning that they think the whole thing can be done in the month. and democrats control the senate by the thinnest of margins. but to the extent that senator
democrats the margin they have now and what resulted from that? we know there was no fraud, but what resulted from that was a host of more stringent election laws making it harder to vote in georgia but also elects partisans into this process, by which the state election board could potentially be under the hospices of the republican state legislature. so what that does is it takes a nonpartisan apolitical electoral process and makes it political so you re finding this political war right now, with laws, numbers expected to grow, at the thinnest of margins trying to make changes and clearly they don t have the power they need to and the votes to get that done right now. i know i ve probably used this analogy a lot but democrats