want to say much more than that from here. but again, you know, i want to be really mindful. there is now a presidential campaign, re-election campaign and so those type of questions i would refer you to them. his personal decision, not politics. i totally understand. i don t have anything to share on that. i would refer you to totally understand like what was his decision, what was his thinking process, i would certainly refer you to the 2024 campaign. can you just tell us when was julia chavez rodriguez final day here. i don t have anything to announce from a timeline from here. on sudan, karine, what diplomacy are you engaging in to try to get the ceasefire extended? so, a couple of things, steve, that i want to lay out for you. so the president s senior national security team has been in direct contact with the leadership, you heard directly from our national security advisor jake sullivan on this yesterday to urge the generals,
it? well, it s critical for the intelligence damage assessment for them to understand not sort of what his thinking process was but what actions actually were taken with respect to the documents. so, the factual investigation about did anybody else see these documents, were they communicated to anyone, who else had access to them, who was the intention to do with them? so, was there something that triggered the search that was trying to prevent it, or had it just been so long that they had been trying to get the documents back voluntarily that they finally just had to execute the physical search once they got the court order. but now that we know a little bit more details about the nature of at least one of these particular documents and we know the classifications of others, there s consequences beyond just the u.s. national security establishment. as the director was saying earlier, there are foreign policy considerations. there are foreign countries as andy was saying, there are
served as captain strategist for the former president. how critical is it to figure out why the former president had this material, what who may have had access to it? it s critical for the intelligence damage is. for them to understand not what his thinking process was, but what actions were actually taken, with respect to the documents. the factual investigation about did anybody else see these documents, where they communicated to anyone, who else had access to them, what was the intention to do with them? was there something that triggered the search that was trying to prevent it, or had it just been so long they had been trying to get the documents that they finally executed a physical search. now that we know a little bit more details about the nature of, at least, one of these
the way down to a toothbrush. we just focus on helping families get into homes. the more i learned, we want to get into the business of giving people the potential to break their cycle of poverty and with that is financial literacy, health and wellness, educational attainment and working towards development and entrepreneurship. up until that point survival was my thinking process. my goal is i hope we can go out of business and when i say that i mean nobody else needs housing.