also kept a lid on that videoooe footage. and in in some cases, dojts did not share it with criminal defendants who d beeged onn chan on january six in violation of . their constitutional rights. so we felt it wa so we felt it c anrvice to bring what we could to you. there was no justificationd for keeping the secret any longer. a poand a powerful argument to e made that sunlight is always and everywhere. the best disinfectant. it and in fact, because it waso soe video evidence, it is to some extent self-explanatory. anyone could look at the tapapee and decide what he or she thinks of it.very c so the tape we showed lastlearla night indicated very clearlys et that capitol hill police in pro some cases escorted protestersha through the capitol as if they were giving a tour. they did that with jacob.sley translate the so-called q and uncommon ad qanot one poit they even tried to open locked doors on channelize behalf. beha he was sentenced to four years in prison for his cr
is the capitol police were notcl think ab prepared for what happened.use r and that s fascinating when you think about it, because e there was ample warning the federal intel and law enforcement agencies knew perfectly welle there could be a massive but disturbance at the capitol. y but the frontline officers y on duty that day didn t know. and yet the people who kept that information from the frontline officers were overwhelmed by thousands of people milling aroun d the cad t the capitol building. the people who fell down on the job, their jwho didn t t their job, they were not punished.they they were wrded and rewardedo and you have to ask yourself, why is that? here we go .. many in federal la many in federal law enforcement ofew perfectly well there was going to be a huge demonstration in washington on the afternoon ofly january six . 2020 one , and that it viol couldent. debat become potentially violent. there is no debate about thatt s fact.lso the fb cli knew . but it s also
oversight of president trump. zero. that is what it sounds like when they abdicate their duty under the constitution. we ve been asking for months for basic oversight for the president and his advisers and their ties to russia. but our chairman jason chaviz has not lifted one finger. he has not requested one piece of paper. think ab where we are right now. general flynn flew to moscow to have a lavish dinner with president putin and celebrate the kremlin backed media outlet rt. according to our own u.s. intelligence officials rt is, and i quote, the kremlin s principle international propaganda outlet, end of quote.
enforcement officer could neither constitutionally nor legally cute obstruction because that would amount to him obstructing himself. think ab and that he could, if he wished, terminate the inquiry or even he sdesired. pardon to power, if it s a similar argument to the one nixon famously made after leaving office. when the president does it, that means that it is not illegal. by definition? exactly. in introduce over the weekend, rudy giuliani, who joined the president s legal team after the letter was sent to mueller acknowledged the potential political consequences if the president were to pardon himself. president trump is not going to do that. he s obviously not going to give up any of his pardon powers or any other future president s pardon powers, but under these circumstances he is not going to do that. the president of the united states pardoning himself would just be unthinkable, and it would lead to probably an immediate impeachment.