so i took to the streetso trac with raymond to track down the pot revelers. what we found may surprise you. and in moments, my angle on howe the left wants you to live in neverland. neve, breaking tonight, senior law enforcement officials telling nbc news thatt there is growing frustration inside the fbiof as they finishr the bulk of the work b on the joe biden case over a year ago. veand reportedly, the irs finished its part ofportedly the investigation more than noyear ago as well. now, remember, the washington post had previously reported that there was enough evidence discovered to charg rebiden with tax crimes and a false statement relatedhe to gun purchase. now, thi s comes out on the heels of another bombshell report that could be the straw that broke biden ss back . a whistleblower special agent alom the irs has come forwar cdm to alleglee that joe biden wastn getting special treatment in special protection inn the agency s investigation of his son , hunterth. the
,you will remember, lecturinguiy the rest of us about equity, meaning that straight white men are bad. and yet, strangelyy th, the perl he chose for this job was not ws a member of a racial or minority. guinority. privileged straight white guy.y he was called nick mcquaid. nick mcquaid went to private schools. he wrote at wesleyan. he w went to columbia for law school. he is definitely not oppressed. but that did not mattemar to joe biden. some jobs are too important for affirmative action. liquid ertives main qualificn was being the former law l partner of hunter biden aws criminal attorney in december criminal attorney in december a latham and watkins lawyer called chris clark to defend him againslaar t potential federaljust a tax charges. just a month later, hunter biden s dad hired chris clark s partner, nick mcquaid, to oversee the agency that could bring those federal tahex charges. that seems like an obviousglr and glaring conflict, buint no, nick mcquaid did not
many similar movements that arae on the way. inevitably, and the few visionaries who have grasped this obvious truth weirdly , have not been welcomed by blue am america. they have been mockeda, they and derided as prophets, always are. a fewfe years ago, foro, example, a blue blond woman from montana called rachel dolezal declared that she wanas black because she decided that she was black . blackness was rachel dolezald lived experience, but she was not greeted as liberators. t gr she was almost immediateh booed off the stage and then she disappearee d and tellingly, none of the people yelling atye rachel dolezal ever explained whdy she couldn t be black. why not?t? in this country, you can change your , but not your race. really, how does that work? what species of science are weec talking about here? it was note are we defensible al and so over time, like alle ar indefensible arguments, it will collapse someday. the new york times will give g rachel dough s all its
positionm schiff using a position of the intel chairina lying to the american publicmeag again and again. swalwell, you all know, doesu a not have the ar should have the responsibility to serve on the intel committee. i ll put the nationarve on thely ahead of partisan politics any day. integrit the nationay matters ae going to make the intel committee back to what it was tt supposed to be.s suppos well, today, those aforementioned democrats held a press conference on being mocrats hebooted. it was a sad affair alleging ofis was merely an act of political retaliation by mccarthy. in other words political ret, te basically owed these positions will only, i think, breed with distrust within the intelligence community. ligenceas to what it can shares and what it caann feel confident about sharing with thecong congress. our mission noress. our mw is to restore the credibility and integrity of this institution. of which the speaker has so gravely so gravely smasheddestro and
and there was infanticide at scale to the western mind. therw the whole thing was repugnant and alien. but maybe the most un-american thing about the chinese, one child policy was a policya h itself. the idea that government could ment cf into the moste deta intimate details ofilof your private life struck most americans at a gut levell as incomprehensible. the whole point of america was to avoid plans like that. the whole point of america is personal freedom. that s where the country was founded. what you do in private on your own time, with your own money i within the boundaries of the law wanesss your own busines and nobody else s business wasn foundational point. and on that question, therequesi appeared to be thankon god , bipartisan agreement. conservatives believed in the bill of rights. liberals believed in personal choice. my body, my choice, they said government out of our personal ths. didn they said thatt for decades now we know they didn t mean it turns out th