unfortunate attack. what s your legal and political assessment of these claims from two gop presidential hopefuls? i don t think they re making legal assessments. those are political comments. they are both running for president. they are trying to thread the needle of getting the former president s supporters and theying say will hold up the mantle, and they will be trumpism without trump. they are careful not to turn off those who support him, which potentially means saying, what most of us see. there was an insurrection on the capitol. there is likely the potential of a criminal indictment when it comes to the 2020 election. those are things they don t want to say out loud. that s a political calculation. i don t read that as a legal assessment. overall, what is trump s legal or likely legal jeopardy, as all of the various
unpredictable. we re in a election year and a lot of democrats are tarred and feathered on the notion theying : iters are getting tired of the spending. that s the arges oennet rete ges make but has it moved the kneeled much in needle much in terms of no3 notes? i think the same way when we talked about healthcare and saw many moderate conservative democrats from swing district and republican leaning districts, i think there s a possibility of sim mar3 noting patterns. there are too many democrats for a b ml like this to not be3 noted on to make it out of the house. particularly after the senate already did inet work and you don t have to have house members wonder if it dies in the senate. but i think is ares indicatedlef how strongly republicans feel about the environment that theying say, we don t want a bill that