situation dictate she should have time to deal with this. she continues to believe a full nonpartisan investigation into the matter is needed and she is willing to cooperate with the committee. however, the committee planned to move forward with a hearing with two witnesses is not a good faith investigation. there are multiple witnesses that have appeared publicly and should be included in my any proceeding. the rush to a hearing is unfess and contrary to the committee discovering the truth. joey jackson, one person they don t want to hear from is mark judge. christine ford is saying was there in the room at the time. and the judiciary committee republicans are saying theyen wont even have that person come in and testify and say what happened. or talk to the fbi and be forced to talk with the fbi under oath. what do you make of all that and what do you think of this reaction coming from lisa banks. it sounds like she s following your advice and saying, no thanks. first of all, i thin
dangerous. in the circumstance of thean individuals that broke into herr car you mean the cops tucker: the city is not doing anything. why shouldn t people take the law into their old hands? while the police department,w the prosecutor s office, theyen are the ones that should be doing this. in the instance where individuals broke into her car and jumped into another car, there are rules that the police commission has set where the police department cannot chase. you can break into a place but as soon as you get into a vehicle, they are ordered not to chase. i m confused. tucker: typically, the laws in the city, state or country are written to protect normal people. taxpayers, people with families, people who aren t bothering anyone and these laws seem to be written to help criminals. why is that?
under his eye? his joke later was, how great was it to have lenin staring at my backside for an hour and a half. [laughs] to be a perfect form for him to deliver his message. [applause] the students filed in and settledn down. he warmed up his audience by wishing them success in their own language. i know you must be very busy this week, studying and taking her final examinations. so, let me just say (speaking russian). we americans make no secret in our belief to believe in freedom. go it in any school room.ee there you will see children are taught the declaration of independence, that theyen are
5-year-olds and 4-year-olds and 8 and 9 months old. they are traumatized and separated from parents they never been apart from most likely. they can t communicate their needs and being flown or bussed across the country. so they are deeply permanently traumatized, for the people who are working with them, they didn t go in this to be apart of the process. theyen went into the work because they care deeply about the welfare of children and migrants and refugees. who work that piece on the chaotic effort to reunite immigrant parents with their kids. putting together a task force on reunification, just published add few minutes ago and run out
the ka bosh on it, but this is what papadopoulos has told mueller s investigators, the house republican intelligence committee never spoke to papadopoulos. they didn t know what he has said. that s critical testimony. and the democrats on the committee who i have interviewed say, when they come on, the people who they did interview, they didn t press them, theyen did the follow up on them, it s as if they re not looking for it s pretty obvious, if you look at what devine nunes has done over the last year, he s put out distractions and tried to deflect, dinner story lines that have nothing to do with russian intervention in the election. they are democrats, they are partisan, they ve all said the same thing, when witnesses do not answer questions, they are forced to produce records the democrats want.