that s funny. that s a long time ago. that s how long we have known each other. sean: there like 100 lights blaring in my face. laura: we will pick it up where you left off. we will try. i am laura ingraham, this is the ingraham angle from washington tonight. in a moment we will speak to one of donald trump s attorney is about ongoing battle over the release of the affidavit. but first, now since august 8th, the day of the raid on mar-a-lago, the end has been very clear, to at least half of the country this investigation appears to be tainted by politics. now the belief isn t grounded and some knee-jerk dislike of the rank-and-file fbi, but it s recent history. specifically the crusade waged by the deep state against donald trump from 2015 and onward. a two-tiered system of justice, one standard for hunter and hillary, and another for donald trump. fast forward to present day when donald trump took another turn. the u.s. magistrate reinhard bart of jeffrey epstein fame,
but that s a 1% ago. that s how long we really see you in the monitor because it s like one hundred lightsig blaric into my okay well looking good.w well we ll pick it up where you left off. all right, i ll try.ra i m laura ingram . this is the ingraham angle t from washington tonight. in moments we re going toen spek to one of donald trump s attorneyson about that ongoing battle over the release of the affidavit. but for now, since august 8th, the day the rate of mara lago,e the angle has been e veryf clear to at least half of the country. this investigation appears to be tainted by politics. now the belief isn t grounded t in some knee dislike of the rank and file fbi. but in recent history, specifically the crusade waged by the deep state the against donald trump froman 2015 onwardt a two tiered systemie of justic. one standard for hunterno and hillary, another for donaldh trump. now fast forward to present day when the feds hunt for donald trump took another turn. us ma
concerned about, but you ve got a dynamic where it was. com yes, a company thapat waspu a publicly held companbly then liaising with the federal government specific to control conversations politically around politics. l and around an election. d never know this if if elon musk didn t wasn t interested in this particular event. what do you what s your takewh on how all of this is unfolding at this point? well, it s fascinating, isn t it?is wh ty is the government holdingv these meetingserg ? mportant to what purpose? but the more important thing w is what we haven t been tolde he who exactly in the government. we neeactly d their names. wein need their titles. what was their role in those federal agencies? becausl e if they weren t meeting, because they had evidence of a crime, that s one thing for the federal government to do. but if they had no evidence of e a crime but they want to limit speech in any way, shape orr man form and especiallery if there are people inside, those a
0 yeah, there s a long list of things we wouldn t really wantre to see hillary clinton doing. that list. s on she s been singing carpool, carpool, karaoke. karaoke it s kind of great in a way. we re in a little zip belt at the best we get with the ones you love. we ll see you monday. welcome to this specialspec edition of hannity . i m tammy bruce and for sean.ia and webruce begin with a fox ns alert, the third installment of the twitter files is now out detailing the behind the scenes effortes to ban former from president donald trump from the platformth in the aftermath of january 6th. journalist matt taibbi of janu, who broke the news, tweeted tonight, quote, we ll show you what has not what hasn t beenhe revealed. the erosion of standards within the companompanyy in months befe january six . decisions by high ranking executives to violate their own policies and moro violate e aga the backdrop of ongoing documented interactiononcies with federal agencies. taibe then previewed
and regular s oversight from congress in the senate. laura: dr. harvey said she is retiring from the ale this weekend and i will phone and because i can actually go, but had some interesting comments that i would like you to react to you about the agency s internal review that is being talked about. and said that she failed to address the industry subservient and epidemiologic incompetence of what is at the heart of all of this. how could the cdc gets so much science so wrong with this lame apology or whatever this qualifies as, dr. macola? i think a big problem was all of the social distancing they were doing themselves. they weren t meeting, they were trying to do work by webex for a couple of years. this cdc is full of wonderful and talented physicians and scientists, but they got into a direction that went horribly