on hold the testimony. it wasn t just like a passive appeal that would put everything on ice. and so whenever yesterday the speed that the appeals court came back at this with that they hadn t appeared to write anything. additionally, even though it s all under seal it don t look like they were explaining or weighing law in any way. it was just a flat out denial on both the documents and the testimony . they weren t gonna block it, and that s it, so they would have had to get somebody to step up and help them in a very short time before friday, and they didn t do it. i appreciate it. killing poland s now the law firm of roth coats and eisen. former federal prosecutor jessica roth currently have cardoza law school here in manhattan. cnn anchor laura coates, also former federal prosecutor, and cnn legal analyst, norman eisen, who served as counsel to house democrats in the first trump impeachment. lauren, given that evan corcoran is expected to not only testify tomorrow, but turn over th
appeals court for this help and this federal appeals court, they would have had to step up to put on hold the testimony. it wasn t just like a passive appeal that would put everything on ice. and so whenever yesterday the speed that the appeals court came back at this with that they hadn t appeared to write anything. additionally, even though it s all under seal it don t look like they were explaining or weighing law in any way. it was just a flat out denial on both the documents and the testimony . they weren t gonna block it, and that s it, so they would have had to get somebody to step up and help them in a very short time before friday, and they didn t do it. i appreciate it, killing poland s now the law firm of roth coats and eisen. former federal prosecutor jessica roth currently have cardoza law school here in manhattan. cnn anchor laura coates, also former federal prosecutor, and cnn legal analyst, norm eisen, who served as counsel to house democrats in the first trump impeachm
the insurrectionists. the evidence is just right there in the heartland of this statute. so this is the thing that every member of our committee could converge on. it is just completely clear that he had culpable criminal intent. he knew he had lost the election. he knew the crowd was armed and dangerous. he said take down the mags, these were his people, they weren t gonna hurt him. he unleashed the crowd to go and fight like hell, and said that when fraud is involved there are very different rules that are allowed, and so on. i mean, it is just an open and shut case from my perspective. and i hear from public defenders all the time saying that they have had hundreds of
aiding and abetting insurrection, giving comfort to the insurrectionists. the evidence is just right there in the heartland of this statute. so this is the thing that every member of our committee could converge on. it is just completely clear that he had culpable criminal intent. he knew he had lost the election. he knew the crowd was armed and dangerous. he said take down the mags, these were his people, they weren t gonna hurt him. he unleashed the crowd to go and fight like hell, and said that when fraud is involved there are very different rules that are allowed, and so on. i mean, it is just an open and shut case from my perspective. and i hear from public defenders all the time saying that they have had hundreds of clients go to jail on far less evidence that exists against
you know, same thing with the other charges that we talked about, including insurrection, aiding and abetting insurrection, giving comfort to the insurrectionists. the evidence is just right there in the heartland of this statute. so this is the thing that every member of our committee could converge on. it is just completely clear that he had culpable criminal intent. he knew he had lost the election. he knew the crowd was armed and dangerous. he said take down the mags, these were his people, they weren t gonna hurt him. he unleashed the crowd to go and fight like hell, and said that when fraud is involved there are very different rules that are allowed, and so on. i mean, it is just an open and shut case from my perspective. and i hear from public defenders all the time saying that they have had hundreds of clients go to jail on far less