i looked up to the main count, j-3 standing at the door with his body halfway behind it and he was fully exposed and he was masturbating. i was not exposed nor masturbating watching officer barnes. i stepped outside the old jail with an associate whom i was horse playing with. i never saw miss barnes because my attention was not focused on the officer. but i wasn t disrespecting miss barnes by exposing myself or masturbating or watching her. johnson, however, is no stranger to rule 38. he s got 39 disciplinaries total in his file. many of those disciplinaries are for a violation of rule 38, indecent exposure. he has a history of it. despite his denial, johnson is quickly found guilty of his charge. she has no reason to lie about this. i m going to find you guilty of
facility in alabama, we found that inmates had their own method and slang for releasing pent-up sexual tension. the prison term for is gun it. when you re masturbate, the guy pulls the wood out and sees a woman that s a mile away and sees the top of her head and he imagines that he s having sexual relations with her and get off on it. the female officers are often on the receiving end of this unwanted attention. they masturbate. they ll curse you out, call you all types of names or when you walk on the tier, they ll deliberately try to hold you at their cell while the guy across masturbates. me being a female i see it more than male officers probably. the problem is so pervasive, the regulation banning it is known prison wide about. rule violation number 38, indecent exposure/exhibitionism. that s the inmate that s masturbating. it was really, really bad when i
got here in 1998. i mean, it was horrible. indecent exposure is one of our major disciplinary problems. when warden grant culliver arrived at holman in 2002, he instituted zero tolerance policy for violations of rule 38. a sign of disrespect. and not only disrespect to those officers because they know the environment they re coming into, you know it s disrespectful to expose yourself even to the man standing next to you. inmate johnson, ivan black, 206812, standing behind the old jail door with half his body showing fully exposed masturbating watching officer bonds. do you understand these charges? yes, sir. you wish to plead guilty or not guilty? not guilty. during our shoot at holman, inmate ivan johnson faced disciplinary hearing for a rule 38 charge.
at the home and correctional facility in alabama, we found that inmates had their own method and slang for releasing pent-up sexual tension. the prison term for is gun it. when you re masturbate, the guy pulls the wood out and sees a woman that s a mile away and sees the top of her head and he imagines that he s having sexual relations with her and get off on it. the female officers are often on the receiving end of this unwanted attention. they masturbate. they ll curse you out, call you all types of names or when you walk on the tier, they ll deliberately try to hold you at their cell while the guy across masturbates. me being a female i see it more
not guilty? not guilty. during our shoot at holman, inmate ivan johnson faced disciplinary hearing for a rule 38 charge. i looked up to the main count, j-3 standing at the door with his body halfway behind it and he was fully exposed and he was masturbating. i was not exposed nor masturbating watching officer barnes. i stepped outside the old jail with an associate whom i was horse playing with. i never saw miss barnes because my attention was not focused on the officer. but i wasn t disrespecting miss barnes by exposing myself or masturbating or watching her. johnson, however, is no stranger to rule 38. he s got 39 disciplinaries total in his file. many of those disciplinaries are for a violation of rule 38, indecent exposure. he has a history of it. despite his denial, johnson is quickly found guilty of his charge. solitary confinement is only the first half of the prison s