ballot, the judge still has not ruled, but nonetheless, mr. nelson says, you know, if they don t match, so what? ainsley: he said he doesn t want these nonexperts checking. usually i think most people can look at how you registered to vote and your signature and then look at your ballot. if they are not similar, then what they say down in the state of florida those votes are throne out. is he challenging that saying they don t have to look similar. brian: here is what rick scott s camp says. here are lawsuits marc elias could get bill nelson and chuck schumer to pay him for. not vote to now vote online or via snapchat. allow candidates that didn t run but now like to to participate. allow people in southern georgia to vote. they are very close to florida. allow anyone who wasn t registered in 2,000 vote to al gore and have these results counted towards the
supreme court no, what i want is the test of credibility. before we go judge: you re not going to want to miss the five tomorrow. we re missing one big thing. he said there was no smear. we had a guy who just crawled under a rock after calling kavanaugh an attempted gang raper and made twitter private. instead of driving deep on a specific case, what do you is you find a number of specific examples that alone are not sturdy. one, ford, two, ramirez, three, yearbook, four, avaneti s claims, the yearbook, the other case has no corroboration, no witness. individually, they don t match. they are not strong. so what do you is you create an
but individuals from those five muslim majority countries on the list were ven ezuela none wee involved. if you match up the map of the ban i said i meant to say north korea, not north carolina. if you match up the map to that list you put up, they don t match. you can see that. the administration will make the argument that places like syria, iran, yemen, somalia, north korea, they do still pose a threat to the national security of the united states. but you are right to point out that those terrorist attacks, the ones you listed there, clearly, this travel ban wouldn t necessarily have done anything to prevent those specific attacks. while i have you, primaries tonight. what are you looking for? i m looking for the trump sway ability here. he went down, the president did, to south carolina yesterday for
which expires february 19th. under the rule daca amendment, they ought to take a look at the eight states that have recreational laws. but the president, i believe as a candidate came out in an interview saying i believe it should be up to the states. so, how do you reconcile what jeff sessions has done with what president trump has said in the past about this because they don t match, jack. i agree they don t match. and the president isn t the first politician to not have a completely consistent policy that matches campaign rhetoric. but jeff sessions position is his job is to enforce the law. and he plans to enforce the law, of president obama, even the 2013 memo did have exemptions in terms of hus attorn s of u.s. a into marijuana-related crime. and there were some exceptions to that. but i think what a.g. sessions is saying, look, congress has to
you re a realist. i ve been called first. you know donald trump? i briefed him once during the campaign. this is not about me. there are people out there that are experienced hands who in their careers for decades have not only served in government but embraced foreign policy that seems more or less consistent with john bolton s foreign policy could not have been more opposed to everything that donald trump said he stood for. bolton was crazy ideologue. some of these names that we hear just don t make sense. they don t match donald trump who is a realist who says let s pull back and are more restrained. that s not bombs away bolton s position on the middle east or anywhere else in the world. he was for dropping the big one on tehran several years ago in