pard bs? it tells me they re playing it safe. they doen t want to throw out negative csignals, so they re keeping them friendly. and that s a smart strategy. i think that they recognize that if the president were to pardon a slew of people involved in this, that he would be in real hot water and that this would be likely obstruction. this is what happened to knicks en. the fact he promised pardons to people. hinted at them. they were all over the tapes. having err lihis top domestic gd out signals to people that he would consider them and that later came back to haunt him with the house judiciary and impeachment bill that was prepared. to be b clear here, ty cobb, the lawyer in the white house, insisted there s no consideration for a flynn pardon. he s also said the same about manafort and gates. he told the washington post,
really hard. jeb bush was.rb ben carson, is spectacular. rick perry bobby jindal. i ll have dinner with ted cruz, and then the ones i m not seeing they re great rand paul spectacular. rubio fantastic person but but they all want to make economic friday prosperity center stage. they doen t want to go off on a tangent on other issues, foreign policy or whatever else. they re all focusing on prosperity through cutting taxes. can you say that? i wouldn t sayln+é cutting taxes. i d say cutting tax rates and broadening the tax behavioral all of these plans i m proposing are static revenue neutral. not going to lose any money. it s static revenue neutral. it just changes the consolation of taxes to constellation of taxes to make is as pro growth as possible. all taxes are bad. some are worse. you want to collect your revenues in the least bad