tucker: on democracy have to ask, and this is ultimately what made me interested in your case, is why did they single you out, so this is a brand-new admin attrition i think the a number is about 3,000 appointees or higher at the beginning of every it administration, all kinds of different jobs, national security advisor is top job of course but there were other big jobs.f they didn t go after any others. there were two things they said about you is that you were crazy and you were dishonest and it shouldn t i guess surprise our viewers to learn the opposite is true in both of those cases. there were a lot of incompetent people higher in this admin attrition, i ve only never jared kushner, omarosa, there s a long list. you actually had the deepest grounding in the u.s. government and how things actually worked the most knowledge of the intel community of anybody in the entire administration.
a red line in the sand other a procedure? right. i m sorry, i ve been on a ballot four times it makes no sense. people don t care about procedures like washington cares about the filibuster. i saw people walking in to vote, four times voting for me, they didn t go what did joe do on the motion to reconsider which people on the floor will say you will always pay on this motion to reconsider it will follow you. no. they don t care about procedure. why? because the senate is designed for the foreseeable future to be very close. it s going to be a 50/50, 51/52 seat in either direction. why not support the filibuster? if you disagree with your
stupid disgusting in jokes and all that stuff is because they want to impress the other members of the community. exactly. they re just flexing for each other in this pathetic and derivative way. i think that is part of the reason why shutting it down could be effective. there has been research done on what happened after reddit a few years ago banned some of its most toxic communities. a lot of those people didn t come back. they didn t go raid other parts of reddit and spread hate to those parts. some of them just kind of went away. and it did actually improve the site. so i think there is evidence. that it s not whac-a-mole really. taking that stuff away can have a really positive effect. there is a core, there is a hardened core of people who will probably follow 8chan wherever it goes. but the sort of casual person exploring 8chan, stumbling on to one of these message boards and deciding to read some more and getting sucked in, there is an on-ramp effect that i think you do
they are performing for community that they there to be look what i m doing and all the stupid disgusting in jokes and all that stuff is because they want to impress the other members of the community. exactly. they re just flexing for each other in this pathetic and derivative way. i think that is part of the reason why shutting it down could be effective. there has been research done on what happened after reddit a few years ago banned some of its most toxic communities. a lot of those people didn t come back. they didn t go raid other parts of reddit and spread hate to those parts. some of them just kind of went away. and it did actually improve the site. so i think there is evidence. that it s not whac-a-mole really. taking that stuff away can have a really positive effect. there is a core, there is a hardened core of people who will probably follow 8chan wherever it goes. but the sort of casual person exploring 8chan, stumbling on to one of these message boards and deciding
let s get a bit more on the state of play. i want to bring in the host of the fumble. thank you for being here with us. are they being treated fair? absolutely not. the world cups that we have had, they have won three of seven gold medals. they won four of six. u.s. men s team hasn t been in 2018, they didn t go. in 2014 they were around 16 where they lost. they are taking this fight to u.s. soccer. the team filing a lawsuit against u.s. soccer federation back in march over equal pay.