@qiu5a1■and in allñi of thiád a came out yesterday in a pretuv public way andñr impugned micha cohen s credibility. doxd we have at(q pictureq ha holding a pictureq of your fábo. the fact thatfá michael cohen couldn t be trusted. what do you make of michael cohen as key witness in allfá og because he st( lied. he lied to congress about trump hotel in moscow that he was trying to build. he plea80■ guilty toe1 qñthat. he hasn t beenñi 100% truthful p that s something trump s lawyers
president s involvement and his state of fámind. and so i do think this is speculation the disagreement between the lawyers whoxd leftte office and alvin bragg had to bá around the strength of%rq case to prove intent without a cooperating i]witness. it could change the!u■ calculat if theyñr hadi] weisselberg on r side building this case. this case is a simple, more straight forward case. there s a lot of hand wringing in certain legal circles in how clean cut this is, in order to make itñi a fely it can t be one crime it needs to effectively be two. it s cooking the books, and then
i dlp love to know, you know, a we look at the magnitude of what may be oni] deck ahead of us, whether this all begins with a porn star who s angry about not getting a cameo onó[■ ñ3[■ appuq can you take me back to what was happening? how this dynamic was ⌝%q■ worked its way over national enquirer between stormy daniels and donald trump.u sure, yes, i think it does.a■ stormy daniels is a porn star,ñ was a ñiporn star,xd but she aspirations. she appeared in w3mainstream ñi
delayed. indeed. after a reported bombçó threat s called into the courthouse. after theñi security threat was cleared itxd went on. the judge innb■ that case said s case ist(5a■ quote, complex but complicated. meanwhile, on mr. bragg s hush money case the whole country +! termed indictmentxd watch. we have reports that an indictment coulde1xd potentiall come as early as tomorrow, as the day after this one. that reportedly the grand jury is set tot( hear tomorrow reportedly the grand jury isxd t to hear frome1 at least one morq witness. that reporting is notq confirme by nbc news.
there s just a lot we don t know right nowxd that we llfá learn n indictment goes t(forward. the campaign finance violation the way thexd case is built, bears similarities to the mq■ john edwards in çóu given the3w■ past case against edwards who beat criminalxd cñ!tges that hush money used to hide an extramaritallp affair amounted toñi anr contribution.fáq a totalled $1 million.qfálpfá it seems like that if that failed in court, if edwards got off forçó that, isn t a tighter