say then that is something you want to know unequivocally? there was no no quid quo pro. there was no promise of aid delayed if there wasn t cooperation on the part of the government? neil, i think we all would like to know exactly what happened and if we do, it would be easy to make a decision whether there was high crimes and misdemeanors, let s remember, that is what the standard is here. let s do it, get it all public. i can if it gets to senate, i will be a responsible juror, listen to all the facts presented by both sides and make a decision. but this idea the democrats are only one that get the facts and only person been transparent is president trump, is wrong. be transparent, let everybody ask questions. why what are democrats trying to hide? they are killing their process. why wouldn t you do it the right way? neil: we ll watch closely, senator. they might be coming together
understanding. it is not a lateral action on the part of pakistan. there are operational reasons for these that i can t go into but the fact remains pakistan and the united states continue to remain in robust intelligence cooperation, we want to improve the relationship between our mill taerz in terms of going after the terrorists but we also have a case here, and that case is that there is too much mistrust of pakistan. yes, there is a history to it and we understand, for example under the musharraf regime, there wasn t cooperation. but the democratic government of pakistan has fully cooperated with the united states and secretary clinton being a nonled that. it is a process in which we need to overcome the burden of history, move forward. so there will be certain occasions when we will be taking a step back. but there will be many occasions when we will move forward together to eliminate terrorism which is the common enemy of both the united states and pakistan. all right, mr. amba