we have experienced shocking deaths, before. jfk, a perfect example. but nothing like this and on this scale. it would have been a big challenge for tony blare because he was a very new i prime minister at this point. there wasn t a sort of rulebook about how to deal with anything like this. the people everywhere, not just here in britain, everywhere, they kept faith with princess diana. they liked her, they loved her. they regarded her as one of the people. she was the people s princess. and that s how she will stay, how she will remain.
around the president similarly pressured. so it s a much greater understanding of the man mcgahn and the pressures trying to serb the president. what i also think is important is this tells you something about what we need to do as a co-equal branch of government. we must not be stymied in the right and obligation of oversight. here we are at the former administration is the former administration. thankfully. i have a bill, the expedited subpoena compliance bill and a reason to make sure to bring it up in judiciary. that we pass it on the floor of the house and the senate passes it. and that the president signs it. so that no one, no bad acting administration like the former administration can stymie oversight of congress. there is a real sort of fatigue with the dynamic that trump turned out to be like
before us and under the previous administration claiming a crazy blanket immunity he didn t come forward and then a long legal battle played itself out so i m delighted that today he is in front of the commit tee, the testimony is continuing as we speak and he s bringing to life volume two of the mueller report, the turbulent times in the white house with the president obsessed over the invest and of course mueller s invest volume two of the attempts to obstruct justice by president trump. i ve read that second volume a couple of times. i m sure you have, as well. don mcgahn made a criminal case of obstruction of justice six instances of it. was there anything that enhances your understanding of why there wasn t a sort of preparation to
this outbreak of ransomware, and you can t really pin to anyone factor itself. chris, what have we been doing the last, i don t know, four years to protect? i mean, have we been sort of caught not making the sort of hardening to our systems. were you responsible for this when you were in government? tell me what has been happening and what needs to happen next. you need to break it down a little bit further, i think, to understand the conditions that have led to this current environment, but first is that when you talk about the nation s critical infrastructure, there is generally not a broad set of regulatory requirements for cyber security. there may be safety standards, there may be other oversight mechanisms in place, but most of our critical infrastructure sectors do not have regulatory requirements, and thus, you know, any sort of cyber security
this seems like a pretty aggressive ban and a pretty serious look at speech that incited a deadly insurrection. yeah. first off, my traditional disclosure, my wife works for facebook. so get that out of the way. thank you. i have no allegiance to the company at all. happy to criticize it. this obviously this ban is significant. people are kind of misunderstanding the significance of it. facebook was never a tool for trump to come out and use as a sort of media manipulator or a bull horn to put out a statement. he had twitter for this and used to have a blog. rip. that s no longer with us. facebook was really important for him to fund raise. this is where potentially small dollar donors are congregate and especially like someone trump. he doesn t have that for two