but he seemed to have an alibi, all three kids were with him in his house the night debbie vanished. and besides, there wasn t a shred of physical evidence to tie dave to the scene of apparently violence abduction. his own daughter, who spent the day after the abduction with dave. told the police said could not have been him. i don t believe that he d even be capable of doing something like this. but then they started poking around in the relationship between debbie and her ex husband. and there were some curious things that began to a marriage. for example, in the months before debbie disappeared, gave took debbie the court, and she was fighting back. kim aguirre was debbie s attorney. the issues that she was dealing with work custody, and support. david had asked the court for a reduction in his $553 a month child support payment. why? because he claims he only earned $6,000 a year. his salary came from his dad. who paid him $500 a month to
elections. that s why they re so attracted to violence. hypocrisy, you can t get past it. they were sent to congress on the same ballot they think were zapped by italian lasers. can you not snap them out of these moves they were willing to make in service of donald trump? you can t. we know that, right? because all of the objections that came in on january 6th even by the way people who are a little smoother like ted cruz, all of these objections came in at a time where there had been litigation all over the place. where there wasn t a single credible shred of information. rudy giuliani was pushing crazy theories and the pillow guy, but there wasn t a shred of evidence for any of these people to object and that did not stop them at the time and won t in the future. what s interesting to me, look, the constitutional issue and whether or democracy survive is
no. that has been your story for the past how long? six years. it had been six years since the crime, six years of suspicion. but his attorney said it had taken investigators mere hours to come to a conclusion. when you get the messy cases, you get a lot of them. and there s almost an automatic that you go, and you go to the foam or spouse our current spouse and that is the man. we re gonna make it fit. and, the defense argued. there wasn t a shred of physical evidence linking him to the murder. no dna, no prints on the possible murder weapon. nothing. in that bloody scene in her apartment, all the prosecution pointed to us his fingerprints on her cell phone. he was over at the town house quite a bit. it would not have been uncommon for his fingerprints to be all over this place. jarod says sure he used her phone that day. i just remember my daughter handing me the phone. saying that it was her older brother in indiana, and they wanted to talk to me. and they weren
own. a risky move that he believed would prove his innocence. with the conclusion of what they saw, here s dennis murphy. 12 jurors, sitting in judgment of jarod ingram. so back to where we began. did you take a butter knife and plunged into her neck and kill her? no. while the kids were outside? absolutely. not poured bleach on? her now. that did not happen? no. that has been your story for the past how long? six years. it had been six years since the crime, six years of suspicion. but his attorney said it had taken investigators mere hours to come to a conclusion. when you get the messy cases, you get a lot of them. and there s almost an automatic that you go, and you go to the foam or spouse our current spouse and that is the man. we re gonna make it fit. and, the defense argued. there wasn t a shred of physical evidence linking him
it s really striking how quickly so many people scrambled to find alternate bad actors. it was antifa it was lifts, also at one point the fbi and the deep state. i think that that gets to the fact that a lot of these folks from jason miller to laura ingraham, to marjorie taylor greene knew how bad this was and knew they needed to blame other people. and that makes it so much worse that in the days and weeks and months after, they were justifying the lies that led to the insurrection. they were justifying the reasons behind it. you know, that just goes to show how inauthentic they actually are. yeah, but also that it came up as an idea. there wasn t a shred of evidence, not that we subsequently found out there were antifa activists involved or anything, but to hear this just came out from somebody s idea, somebody s thought process, in a text, sent to the chief of staff and clearly you saw that put into action.