happened professor, artist, mom. murdered primal scream came out of me she literally broke down. started crying and hollering. the police were quick t question her acts. maybe two quick. they focus in right from th very beginning has been always does it right? but what if the husband di not. they don t find any dna fingerprints nothing of his in the house. did someone else do the rea killing? i m wondering what was this man capable of so much tragedy so much heartbreak it was very emotional for me we just kept waiting fo them to figure out that they had it wrong it was the 2nd of july, 2008 early evening at a fine ol town called prescott, arizona. some going down, air cooling down you ll find the evening warm here at the town s histori rodeo ground, refugees fro phoenix 2 houras away settle in the stands. to enjoy the cowboys at the very same time, at th few hours away on the very edg of town. a woman named carol kennedy, jogged along the well
no, they said. rather he was the victim o some detectives tunnel venetian, beginning with a slopp investigation. it was kind of a cavalcad of people roaming through th scene that they didn t loc down, trumping to footprints through the house, they didn t steal it off correctly to me, when somebody shows u on the scene and immediately pointing the finger at the ex-husband and that s all they ever did - it s always, boom, right on him? it was always on him. the jurors listen to steve interview with the detectives, the night carol was killed we ve got a suspicious deat and right now, we don t have any other person we don t have any of the perso right now. in which you can hear the suspicions said the defense. and steve, said the attorneys, we a cold fear overcoming him. he s afraid of what s happening, that th investigation is all him they re not focusing on anybod else, anything else, the focus
so, there s a period of time that we don t really know. he might have been in the house, but nobody saw him so, maybe jim s solid alibi wasn t remember how he told everyon he had cancer? sharon, a doctor, discovered something about that i ve seen the medical records. and he had a superficial type o skin cancer at one point, an it had been removed. so, no, he didn t. steve s family even recorde this video, after the murder in which jim said things about carole they found deeply disturbing because, carol and i lived life like an old married couple he was actually rathe obsessed with carol. i have emails that he s writte about how wet he and carol
matches each one of these an steve democker doesn t that s right. in fact, neither stev democker dna or fingerprints were fined at the crime scen so had police focused on the wrong man all along? and because steve democker kne that did he make a foolish mistake, like a frightened man would? all of that occurs once h is placed in custody, lose hope and becomes desperate that should not, in our opinion, should not have been introduce in this trial. that s a whole separate trial, separate issue the defense tried to keep all of that out of the trial it did not succeed yes, because it makes i look like a bad, evil guy wh forced his daughters to us their inheritance money to pay for his attorneys. a low scummy thing to do but, none of that put him i the house, none of that put an dna on him in his house, car
the death of a 22 year old a now back to dateline it had always been an issue the case against steve democke that one fascinating clue, tha could break the case wide open who was mr. 603? that s what people were callin the mysterious dna found under carol s fingernails after sh was murdered one thing for sure, it was not steve. we exhausted so many ma hours and looked at any and al alternatives and then, it was during the long months waiting for a ne trial to begin, the prosecutio had an idea. what if that 603 sample was simple mistake what if something got mixed up