extremely restricted and limited. there are only four health centers in the entire state where a woman can get an abortion. and this law would have had the immediate impact of shutting down two of those facilities, one of which is a planned parenthood clinic. i want to read from federal judge william connelly s opinion and what he said tonight in his restraining order. he said there s a troubling act for justification for the hospital admitting privileges requirement. moreover this court s review of the limited legislative history of the act does not reveal any medical expert speaking in favor of the act or otherwise articulating a legitimate medical reason for the admitting privileges requirement. the bill seems to be filled with that sort of stuff, that the judge himself couldn t justify on any medical policy ground. that s correct. i was really heartened to read that in the judge s opinion. it is the evidence is overwhelmingly of medical experts, is overwhelmingly on
is it trying to shut down abortion clinics, providers? well, this law is just one step to put restrictions targeted specifically at physicians who provide abortion services and ultimately to shut down facilities that provide abortion services. in wisconsin abortion is already extremely restricted and limited. there are only four health centers in the entire state where a woman can get an abortion. and this law would have had the immediate impact of shutting down two of those facilities, one of which is a planned parenthood clinic. i want to read from federal judge william connelly s opinion and what he said tonight in his restraining order. he said there s a troubling act for justification for the hospital admitting privileges requirement. moreover this court s review of the limited legislative history of the act does not reveal any medical expert speaking in favor of the act or otherwise articulating a legitimate medical reason for the admitting