craig, this goes to the problem of president trump on the world stage and here in this country. we re in a situation right now where you really can t believe what the president said. he told us today he s losing 3 to $5 billion being president. he said obama lost crimea. you can t believe anything he says. and i agree, this whole notion of talking about doral because miami is a city. it s just rather unseemly. nbc news/wall street journal poll, you ve probably seen these numbers. we asked republicans specifically how president trump is doing so far, approval rating at 86% right now. 86% of republicans said they approved of this president s performance. what do you see as a path to success when there s apparently such strong support among members of your own party? who is the joe walsh voter? they want an alternative. republican voters want an alternative. there isn t one. this president is tweeting us into a recession. i think once his craziness,
dad, this is the person who i called when i wanted something or the person who i got mad at when i didn t get what i wanted, like the person who raised me, the person who took me to the park, bought me school clothes. my daughter, that s her grand that s her pop pop. so i don t see a man who was breaking up a fight because that s what happened. i saw my father standing outside in an area where he lived. so it wasn t uncommon for us to be at a location in statin island because that s where we lived. so the idea that the police had to stop somebody in the commission of a crime. that s ridiculous because if you re saying that you wanted to stop a crime, investigate the fight that was happening. where is the 9-1-1 call that said that you are going there to respond to cigarettes? there isn t one. but there is a 9-1-1 call that said that there was a fight and a fight needed to be broken up. they also said that he had cigarettes on him, which is absolutely false. a search of my father s c
want to save it, whether you agree with her ideas or not, it puts her in an interesting position going into the debate and to call out the president s erratic behavior which is something we get to see on display every day. that, you know, again, starts to continue to undermine people s confidence in the president. again, she s got a plan for that. i think it s a smart strategy. that is a good point as we wonder how they re going to differentiate themselves, perhaps that is the answer. but if there is, as some economists are predicting, david, some type of downturn absolutely wherever you think it s going to be, is this a good strategy for her, and what if there isn t one and she s hinging her campaign on this? if she s hinging her campaign she s already in dire straits in my opinion. the economy is turning along strongly. as long as the economy continues to do well, i like our chances, the president s chances against any of these folks. to argue that, you know, this is go
everything. rate, the motivation, why do you want to add it wak on? that s what became the question before the supreme court. there are a couple of things i want to play for you because i want to get your take. one is ken cuccinelli. s the accurate aing director of the citizenship agency for president trump. let me play what he said. frankly, as part of the ongoing debate about how we deal both financially and legally with the burden of those who are not here legally, that is that is a relevant issue. it s not an entirely clear to me exactly what he is trying to say in the reasoning for putting the question on the census. what do you make of the reasons zroo i m not sure it s clear to him either. the question that they re proposing to put on the census sus a question, are you a citizen or not. yes. it wouldn t ask whether or not you re undocumented or not. the rationale that mr. cuccinelli is articulating there isn t one that could be advanced by a citizenship question. it w
nicholas the japanese perspective here is that this is a long running tradition and part of their culture can you understand that perspective. no i don t because actually i think i think it s kind of a. rhetorical because the whaling we see today is kind of a product of the 2nd world war widow was and need in terms of providing protein to the people but what we ve seen over the past decades has been a significant decrease of interest in demand it s a truck so what the whaling to try whalers to facing isn t long existing market and what will happen now is that the government will spend lots of money to create an artificial dumont you know they will trim old way products in schools etc and i think that s really the wrong way to go with we would like to see his face out of that of that activity but nicholas why would the japanese government want to do that create an artificial market where there isn t one. well