would pay instead of, you know, spreading wealth based on need. money woulneedd be allocated to individuals purely based on the issue of race. racnow, the premise, according to the left, would be to compensate for the evils oflavey slavery. now, first, the country billn simply cannot afford the billions and billions of dollars and trillion s of dollars that it would likely take to allocate and ultimatelyn ,i t is a punitive measure and one that will even furthervi dividede a country thaty deep is already deeply divided. those who support reparationly o believe that america is an evile country filled to the brim with generous notions of bad people. and while no intelligent perso n ,let me be clear, deniese the evils of slavery, it wouldnl be a great injustice to ignore all the progress this country has made on racial issues and other issues. which is the beauty o our great constitution. it has provide d all of us a roadmap that we can right wrongs and correct injustices. o
americans . do you agree with that? i fully agree with that, sean . and if you also look, you were just talking about the fentanylo crossing the souther n border that is also killing overmerica two hundred americans pensr day. on american soil. and so that s why i think we need to take this to the nextilg leve tl. building the wall alone is notfe sufficient. this is killinntg americans onim american soil. that is a justification foeroilr using the u.s. militaryy that to actually secure our southern border. that s why i was the first someidate to sayfirst candid ife our military to secure somebody else s border somewhere else bor we can certainly use our own military to secure our own southernow border. on tha and we need leadership to actually deliver on that. this is not absolute. on what do you think the motivation is ? why? why have they adopteadoptepolicn that they re going to leave the borders wide open and thenan bordy the borderd save is secure, which if i hear being one mor