be a violation of thee federal campaign finance laws because that would be violation of rather direct or indirect giving of they are basically giving a campaign donation in that situation. and you can t do that in federal elections.n. for the president and forr congress. then we are also learning today that hillary clinton s name coming up once again now connected to all the problems with facebook that the app she was using during the 2016 campaign and they were encouraging people to connect with their friends. they may have been w going through your contacts list and doing that illegally and taking the data of their users to encourage people to vote for hillary clinton to try and find people that they could persuade to be voters. not very good news for facebook all around. and this is all in light ofs the problems that they are having with the cambridge analytica story that we haveid been following for the past couple of weeks with the 50 million users and the data that was taken fr
never a good thing. for him there is a smaller number of people reading newspapers much lessendorsements and he has bigger problems than the new jersey star leather. i think a lot of people are getting tired of talking about him. we are going to have to wait this out and see if the questions are answered. if he knew about this or was involved, he is in deep deep trouble. if he didn t, it is a new set of circumstances. anna has a point. people are tripping over hem se themselves. it is nice to have that endorsement. the star leather was a reluctant endorsement. do people care who gets support as anna elude ed to? i don t think so.