with gloria allred. is there a presumgts they are move ng the direction of a case against donald trump? well, ironically, because they have now caused donald trump to have to come out an say these things are not true, he s called them liar, he s ironly, opened up an avenue for relief they may not have had. assuming their claims are true, we don t know if they are or not. but if their claims are true and donald trump has falsely accused them of being liars, then they could ironically now bring him to court on a theory of defamation, slander and liable. just like he s threatening to do. even if this was an appearance just to reveal her accusations, but they didn t and hadn t cobbled together a legal case, he may have opened the door to one because he s called her a liar. he s called the number of of the women who have come forward now
called them liar have a long long look and perhaps apologize to these women who had the braverly to come forward and admit and talk about the things that he did to them. mark it is interesting in the deposition. he talked about getting a number of prescriptions for quaaludes in the 70s when quaaludes were available in the united states. to my knowledge they re no longer available in the united states. and he was asked whether he kept those quaaludes until 2005 with andrea constant that was objected to by attorneys, and i don t believe that question was answered. i am not clear if he still had quaaludes in the mid 2001s, if he got them overseas you can still get them overseas or perhaps it was true he was using something else? i think what her attorneys were trying to get to was the fact that he may well have had the quaaludes he said he had prescriptions for in the 70s in 2005. don t think that was relevant or