and it would be bad if by the way, you could also use the whole conspiracy thing, the fact if the president or if a defendant is part of a conspiracy that continues, you could essentially extend the statute of limitations so even though it tends to run out in five years, you could continue going because the president and people around him are part of this conspiracy to obstruct the investigation, for instance. yeah. right. just looking at this, the tweet that we put up can we put that tweet back up before we go to break? george conway, given that trump has repeatedly lied about the daniels and the mcdougal payments and given that he lies about virtually everything else to the point that his own former personal attorney described him as an fing liar, why should we take his word over that of federal prosecutors? conservative, an attorney, husband of kellyanne conway who had just appeared. he sent this, which should go not go unnoticed, at 10:09 which
evidence to back up what trump is saying but this thing about being embarrassed, what s your reaction? well, that s a new line. we haven t heard that. other than the recent charges about cohen being out to embarrass him. well, the truth does embarrass him, apparently. he can t handle the truth but don, you know, history is going to look back on this period and we re going to have trouble explaining it to future generations. the unbelievable dissembling this president has done. he s in the 6,000 misstatements, false statements, misleading statements now. and it will probably be 12,000 by the time his hopefully first term is over. i think you re right. the studies show that younger people have an easier time seeing through the bs and figuring out what the facts are than older people do because they re more influenced by ideology, which is interesting to me. so we re going to have a lot of explaining to do to the people coming up behind us and i think
them during the campaign. several executives and employees who directed or participated in a scheme to reimburse cohen for those payments. we know he received, meaning cohen, he received a total of $420,000 from the company, including a $60,000 bonus. the company falsely recorded those payments as legal expenses. so the question is, who was involved in these payments? we know from a 2015 trump university deposition that there are only five people who have the authority to make financial decisions or sign checks for the organization, only one of them isn t a trump. okay. i m talking about the president of the united states. his children, don junior, ivanka, eric and the trump organization s chief financial
trump organization from earlier this year. so even after the investigation into michael cohen has come to a close, the organization itself and other people there will and the children were obviously there during the campaign and several of them continue to be there is ongoing. i this i that s really noteworthy and if i were a member of the trump family and worked at the trump organization, i would be concerned. so michael, with that said, you say that the trump children should consider making deals. why is that? well, i think that they could find themselves not too far into the future being prosecuted or perhaps convicted of something and their father may not be president any longer. so then who would pardon them? there s also the matter of state claims, the trump foundation is especially vulnerable there.
fired. he was part of the transition. he was in part of this inaugural committee. he knows a lot of information. he s been probablysuccessful, ot fruitful cooperators as part of this investigation. i think we don t know the full story of what rick gates has done behind the scenes and they have seem to have embraced him and i think that is driving a lot of this investigation. uh-huh. i just want to give you do i have it in my e-mail, everyone? okay. let s put this up on the screen. this is new. this is from george conway. okay? yep. there, here we go. given that trump has repeatedly lied about the daniels and mcdougal payments and given that he lies about virtually everything else to the point that his own former personal lawyer described him as a fing li liar, why should we take his word over that of federal prosecutors? i needed him in that with chris cuomo just moments ago. considering we were talking