laura: but hold on san francisco spent $305 million last year on the homelessness crisis. at some point, do we not think huh, may be how they are deploying their money where their solutions aren t working. supermajority, democrat-run city, there are no republicans they run them out, that s how it works, but at some point, do we say, okay, who s chance is it next to fix this problem? democrats just want to say this has been going on for decades but they have been at g the helm for now decades in san francisco, have they not? so, again, this goes back to certain court rulings and laws.. we just passed a new law here in california that allows extended conservatorship. it s upsetting certain groups, but it will allow us to provide the services that are needed for the visible homeless. and i want to point out quickly charlie really misapplied the
wrong direction. one policy we can point to here outside of the obvious, the city is run by all democrats, all democrat city council, is proposition 47, passed a couple of years ago, which essentially decriminalized petty crimes and opened up overcrowded prisons. unfortunately, people that really need help are on the streets of san francisco, and when they do things that are questionable, such as publicly defecating, there is no consequence whatsoever.su when you decriminalize the little things, all the sudden, the big things fall apart, and you have societal chaos. we saw mayor rudy giuliani tackle this brilliantly in new york city. we have seen a model of a mayor come in and fix structural problems with solutions. mayor giuliani did this in new york city, you are seeing the wrong direction now san francisco, because of proposition 47. democrats that, for whateverit reason, want to avoid the issue. this is why the city is going in the wrong direction. laura: ethan, the residents, wh