hejoins me now from new york. quite a development of give your thoughts on why this has come about. one of the things that might have. before one of the things that might have. before the one of the things that might have. before the trial one of the things that might have. before the trial that one of the things that might have. before the trial that had one of the things that might have. before the trial that had some - before the trial that had some pretty before the trial that had some pretty damaging before the trial that had some pretty damaging ruling - before the trial that had somej pretty damaging ruling against before the trial that had some - pretty damaging ruling against them, fox. pretty damaging ruling against them, fox 0ne pretty damaging ruling against them, fox~ one was pretty damaging ruling against them, fox one was a pretty damaging ruling against them, fox. one was a ruling pretty damaging ruling against them, fox. one was a ruling that prett
exposed over the course of the last several exposed over the course of the last several months exposed over the course of the last several months may exposed over the course of the last several months may have - exposed over the course of the last several months may have never - exposed over the course of the last i several months may have never seen the light several months may have never seen the light of several months may have never seen the light of day several months may have never seen the light of day. thank several months may have never seen the light of day. thank you. - several months may have never seen the light of day. thank you. with - the light of day. thank you. with that, the light of day. thank you. with that, i the light of day. thank you. with that, i would the light of day. thank you. with that, i would like the light of day. thank you. with that, i would like to the light of day. thank you. with that, i would like to handed - the light of day.
coming under attack more than half a century and it is coming under attack these - more than half a century and it is coming under attack these days, | more than half a century and it is. coming under attack these days, the fact that coming under attack these days, the fact that there coming under attack these days, the fact that there is coming under attack these days, the fact that there is a coming under attack these days, the fact that there is a settlement - fact that there is a settlement nreans fact that there is a settlement nreans that fact that there is a settlement means that this fact that there is a settlement means that this is fact that there is a settlement means that this is a fact that there is a settlement means that this is a case - fact that there is a settlement means that this is a case that| fact that there is a settlement. means that this is a case that will not have means that this is a case that will not have a means that this is a case
mind with this particular case is that fox news may be settling this trial, but it does face another lawsuit, and that one is worth an estimated $2.7 billion, where it is being sued for defamation by another electronic voting company, so it may have decided that the business terms it made sense not to risk this trial, and information that would come out during the course of the six weeks in which you would hear text messages, inside workings of the company being shared, which could be used by lawyers in this other looming case. find could be used by lawyers in this other looming case. other looming case. and ust finall , other looming case. and ust finally, michelle, other looming case. and ust finally, michelle, there sh other looming case. and just - finally, michelle, there s literally no more details you can tell us at the moment in terms of how this came about and where the discussions were had and why finally they have come a decision? fist had and why finally they have c
settlement. that is via the new york times. i settlement. that is via the new york times. ~ settlement. that is via the new york times. ,, ., settlement. that is via the new york times. ~ . , settlement. that is via the new york times. ,, ., , ., ~ settlement. that is via the new york times. ,, ., , .,~ , times. i think that my take is the followin: , times. i think that my take is the following. and times. i think that my take is the following, and this times. i think that my take is the following, and this comes - times. i think that my take is the following, and this comes within | times. i think that my take is the i following, and this comes within the framework of what adam was just talking about. he laid the thing up pretty clearly. false news is in the press all the time, and my 95% rule is in the financial press, 95% of what is in the press is either wrong or irrelevant, so there is a lot of fake news, false news of irrelevant news in the press all the time. this business