will use whatever he can. and there is another opportunity at the supreme court that will give them an opportunity to overturn roe v. wade. i think he should intervene and argue against whatever the state is doing. it s mississippi and their restrictive laws. so there are things that we can do. at the same time what should be happening is that every state should be codifying roe v. wade has hawaii did a couple of years ago because thee laws are being enacted at state legislatures all across the country and that s where we need to take the fight. let s talk about codifying roe v. wade in the federal. obviously the supreme court will be hearing the case in the fall and we ll see where they land on that. codifying roe v. wade when it comes to federal law, obviously
policy maker we are told climate is changing because of man made activity these are the laws we want you to pass. i look at those laws they want us to pass and i asked them well how much inches of sea rise will that law prevent it won t prevent any but set example for the world. i look at the economic impact of that law and it s significant on real people making america uncome at the timive for business and jobs. let me get it straight you want me to support a law that does nothing to help the environment but significant negative impact on our economy, that s a terrible tradeoff. do you also have a longer view that in the event that longer view of climate change and maybe do something differently. yeah, ask china or india to do something different. they say that we have destroyed the environment for decades. they are wrong. we are cleaner than they are. they say for years we have been ahead of them in manufacturing all sorts of things and that we have dirtied up the environme
policy maker we are told climate is changing because of man made activity these are the laws we want you to pass. i look at those laws they want us to pass and i asked them well how much inches of sea rise will that law prevent it won t prevent any but set example for the world. i look at the economic impact of that law and it s significant on real people making america uncome at the timive for business and jobs. let me get it straight you want me to support a law that does nothing to help the environment but significant negative impact on our economy, that s a terrible tradeoff. do you also have a longer view that in the event that longer view of climate change and maybe do something differently. yeah, ask china or india to do something different. they say that we have destroyed the environment for decades. they are wrong. we are cleaner than they are. they say for years we have been ahead of them in manufacturing all sorts of things and that we have dirtied up the environme
senators republican senators voting not in line with the senior republican senators from their own state. this seems to be increasingly generational. it is really really interesting, pop pill. and this is inside the republican party, so many debates we see in washington are republican versus democrat. this is republican against republican. and you re right, there is a generational split. mike lee from utah for example, voting differently from orrin hatch from utah. across the board, at least five or six different examples of that. and a lot of western senators from the west who, a lot more libertarian strain goes through their politics. so it is a generational divide. perhaps the younger people understand the technology more. they are a little more offended by these privacy rules and other things but? a fascinating moment in the future and direction of the republican party here but at the same time we have to keep in mind all of thee laws were signed or most of these laws were signed