to go further. but that doesn t seem to be the way the congress is feeling. right, and that is a rescue for democrats of possibly trying to overplay their hand. there is had been trumpeting of collusion with russia by some members. there might be nothing revealed in that at the end of the day. this way steve scalise, republican from louisiana was indicating yesterday he thought the only collusion and he is not seen the report nor has anyone here, he was saying the only collusion was between some democrats and some members of the media. but the real meat and potatoes he will be looking at the report. i should point out that caná that led the whitewater and monica lewinsky situation. the statute within the late 1990s was far brighter. what happened in that instance is the report was delivered to the congress, then house of representatives voted to release the starr report. this is in september 1998. here you are operating under a different statute and so it doesn t have to come to cap
since august of 2016 by the fbi and then buy them mueller. there is no evidence at all of any collusion or any improper activity. as far as russia is concerned. as far as the cooperation he had with kislyak command a subsequent interview with the fbi, the fact is that at the time first of all, those conversations with kislyak are totally legal and appropriate. harris: we had robbery formerly of the whitewater independent counsel say exactly what you re saying in terms of the legality of those. of those. right. as far as his interview with the fbi come afterwards, the fbi agents and combing himself looking for the transcript of what was said were not certain that he was lying. could have been confused customer could have been somehow turn makes a big sound better than it was? but not lying. right. ultimately, he decided to plead guilty and to that account nothing reflects on any involvement with russia, nor at all roof don t like it own