they are arguing it seems for the market forces to sort of let themselves play out here. that is absolutely right, look, rahm emanuel is confusion -ts law with liberal outrage. unless chick-fil-a is engaged in the discrimination in hiring, or the discrimination of public accommodation of its customers it s going to be real hard, because all he s really doing is flapping his wings, because under the first amendment what is good for the goose is also good for the chicken. i want to first thank you that s the most i ve ever watched of the view in my life. martha: we ll try to keep it in very limited increments like that. and i basically agree. listen, the bottom line is government can t say you can t come in because you believe a certain way, but government can and should enforce any discriminatory practices that may or may not be going on there and the public has the right to say, look this guy is spending the money we spend at chick-fil-a on causes we don t agree with, so we re no