going to happen. dana: that s true. jesse: what did he say? bret: good evening. i m bret baier, breaking tonight. blame game over the southern border intensifies as the migrant surges. the biden administration is pointing financingsers at republicans saying the g.o.p. is are rejecting throtion add more agents. this comes as democrats call on the white house to do more. as homeland security secretary alejandro mayorkas faces a republican-led impeachment effort over dereliction of duty we will speak with secretary mayorkas live in moments. bill melugin is in eagle pass, texas again with the latest on the ground and we begin with white house correspondent jacqui heinrich live from the north lawn. good evening, jacqui. jacqui: good evening to you, bret. right now the white house and the house are not talking. even as a bipartisan group in the senate tries to work out a border policy reform deal they hope could also pass the lower chamber and unlock funding. and right now
thank you for joining me. i m fredricka whitfield. ukraine s president, volodymyr zelenskyy, made a dramatic appearance in japan where he s holding crucial meetings with world leaders at the g7 summit. zelenskyy is pleading his case for continued support in the war with russia. ukraine depends heavily on support and weapons from the g7 leaders who released a statement saying this we reaffirm our unwavering support for ukraine for as long as it takes. president biden is expected to have a face-to-face with zelenskyy tomorrow, and in a significant win for ukraine, the u.s. has signaled it will now allow allies to send f-16 fighter jets to ukraine and support training its pilots. that s a major about-face for the biden administration. russia and ukraine are not the only thing on the agenda at the summit. western leaders are tackling ways to confront china s increasing military power and how to approach the growing impact of artificial intelligence. mark stewart is in hiroshima
wrongdoing. others include singer michael jackson, attorney alan dershowitz and magician david copperfield questioned me if i was aware that girls were getting paid to find other girls. in total, the documents will include at least 170 names tied to epstein. lawyers for giuffre say roughly 240 documents will be unsealed it could take until monday to see all of them. many of the people named in the documents are not accused of any wrongdoing, bret? bret: all right, nate, we will follow it all. thank you. you got it. bret: the terror group isis is claiming responsibility for two suicide bombings that targeted an drone strike. wednesday s attack in iran killed 84 people. wounded another 284. the u.s. state department says the attack has all the hallmarks of an isis strike but stopped short of confirming that assessment.
section 230, they ll resist any case against it. it really is incumbent on congress, where you do get some bipartisan support, to essentially look at 230 and see whether it is still valid in a day and able in which we know algorithms and radicalization sort of joined forces to create the kind of incitement that would lead to violence. it s interesting, these cases are not touching on right-wing extremism. they are isis-related cases about people using u.s. platforms to not only recruit but raise money and organize. if the congress determines we no longer want to treat social media companies as mere platforms, and they do have an affirmative duty to get this stuff off or will be held liable if they don t, that is a lot of
implications. in the first case, the court ruled unanimously that twitter was not liable for hosting tweets created by the terror group isis. the court dismissed the second case which accused youtube of aiding and abetting terrorism thus dodging a chance to narrow a key liability shield for websites, known as section 230 of the communications decency act. i want to talk about this and what it all means with jennifer rodgers and juliet khiyam. the court was in agreement on the case against twitter. so, what does that suggest to you? what happened in the twitter case is interesting because they actually didn t rule on the parameters of section 230. they decided the case on the common law issue of whether twitter had aided and abetted