shifts. so i see in my mind their uniforms coming in and they would always be carrying their weapons and take them off and put them way up high on the china cabinet so the kids couldn t get to them. i remember feeling very proud of them and the service that they provided. and i think it s probably what led my brother, who is 10 years younger than i am to decide after he graduated from college he would want to also be in law enforcement. so i am very familiar with law enforcement, the important service that they provide. the perils of being out on the street protecting and serving and having a family that cares about you and worries about your safety.
0 whether or not they still present a threat to the united states or the world at large and i think it s six months, maybe a year. but that goes on at least on an annual basis, and if there is a determination that this person still represents a threat to the united states, they are continued to be confined. that s the way the system works. are you okay with that? as a policy matter, senator, i m not speaking to my views. my understanding is the periodic review system is an executive branch determination of whether or not they are going to continue to hold people. does that make sense to you as a way to deal with these detainees? senator, i m not in a position to speak to the policy or discretion of the executive branch regarding how they are going to handle detainees. the reason i mention is because in one of the briefs you argued the executive branch doesn t have that option. if you had had your way, the executive branch could not do periodic reviews about the danger the detai