to basically block those lawsuits in north carolina. now, income door in south carolina, the coal ash problem there did not play out the same way. next door, they didn t have a former duke energy executive as governor. and in south carolina, the state didn t intervene when environmentalists brought their lawsuits. so now in south carolina literally this past week, you can see duke energy trucking away coal ash as part of a voluntary out of court settlement. in south carolina, they got a duke cleanup that started last week. in north carolina, though the state intervened to stop the lawsuits. what they got in north carolina was a disaster and then it was the feds who stepped in and now that disaster has duke energy apologizing in the papers and paying the biggest criminal fine in north carolina history. what does that mean for the state government? and when that case got settled, it appeared maybe duke s admission of guilty would be tend of it. but check this out. the lawyer for duke ene
safety never checked his record. captain steve entemen oversees licensing for armed guards. this guy s juvenile records apparently weren t checked, so where was the breakdown? because arizona does not require juvenile records to be reported, in this particular instance it was an adjudicated record as opposed to a conviction. it does not show he had any record whatsoever. certainly the check could have gone beyond that, you could look at his juvenile records. we could look at his juvenile records had he disclosed he had that in his background. so as long as he lies on his application, he basically hides his entire juvenile record? in this particular case, yes. reporter: the state didn t even need his juvenile record. since kosakschenko is pribted from carrying a gun, that would have shown up in a federal law enforcement database, but arizona didn t check it. the state of arizona may be a poster child for what s wrong with the nation s lack of
it was an adjudicated record as opposed to a conviction. it did not show he had any type of record whatsoever. reporter: certainly the check could go beyond that, could look at his juvenile records. we could look at his juvenile records had he disclosed he had that in his background. reporter: as long as he lies on his application, he basically hides his entire juvenile record? in this particular case, yes. reporter: the state didn t even need his juvenile record. since he is a prohibited possessor banned from carrying a gun, that information would have showed up in a federal law enforcement database, but arizona didn t check it. the state of arizona may be a poster child for what s wrong with the nation s lack of regulation for the armed security guard industry. the armed guard training consisted of 16 hours, 4 of which took place at a gun range. arizona is 1 of 27 states that doesn t check if someone applying to become an armed
possessor. he lost his right to bear arms, at least until he turned 30. even with all that information, we discovered the arizona department of public safety never checked his record. captain steve entaman. this guy s juvenile records apparently weren t checked. where was the breakdown? arizona does not require juvenile records to be reported on this particular instance, it was in the adjudicated record as opposed to conviction. it did not show a record whatsoever. the check could have gone beyond that. you could have looked beyond the juvenile records. if he disclosed he had that in his background. as long as he lies on his application, he basically hides his entire juvenile record? in this particular case, yes. reporter: the state didn t need the record. since he s a pribted possessor banned from carrying a gun, that information would have shown up
never checked his record. captain steve entenman. this guy s juvenile records apparently weren t checked. where was the breakdown? arizona does not require juvenile records to be reported on this particular instance, it was in the adjudicated record as opposed to conviction. it did not show a record whatsoever. the check could have gone beyond that. you could have looked beyond the juvenile records. if he disclosed he had that in his background. as long as he lies on his application, he basically hides his entire juvenile record? in this particular case, yes. reporter: the state didn t need the record. since he s a prohibited possessor banned from carrying a gun, that information would have shown up in a federal law enforcement database, but arizona didn t check it.