the former president s finances. according to notes that evan corcoran took of his conversations with his client, donald trump, the former president, wanted to fight the subpoena that demanded that he return classified documents that he had no right to have after his time in office. now, these notes taken by corcoran are providing more insight into trump s thinking and his actions around the time the criminal investigation was launched. and now they sit in the hands of a special counsel, jack smith. joining us now is john dean. he was the white house counsel for richard nixon. and just like evan corcoran, john, you testified about your conversations with president nixon. so, as you listen to what has been reported here, in your mind, why would there even be dozens of pages of documents, notes, about what to do with a lawful subpoena? shouldn t that conversation between attorney and client be pretty short? well, you i know mr. trump in the past said he was surprised his whit
at four. but chocolate is my favorite, so this is a poll that i really do believe in. i am. thank you very much. news continues, cnn primetime starts now. anderson, thank you very much. good evening everyone. tonight, two notable developments in the special counsel s investigation of donald trump, including word of yet another subpoena involving the former president s finances. according to notes that evan corcoran took of his conversations with his client, donald trump, the former president, wanted to fight the subpoena that it demanded that he returned classified documents that he had no right to have after his time in office. these notes taken by cochrane are providing more insight into trump s thinking and his actions around the time that criminal investigation was launched. and now, they sit in the hands of the special counsel, jack smith. joining us now is john dean, he was the white house counsel for richard nixon, and just like evan corcoran, john, you testified abo
the 10-year, the 30-year bond. and if anybody thought there was not going to be a deal, they would be trading at double digit yields. the market would have figured out this is going to be a very bad outcome. that s not the case. you have the nasdaq hitting new highs almost. and people are very optimistic that we re full employment. so, this is a bump in the road. politics at its best. it s a classic washington, d.c. don t watch the sausage being made. just eat the sausage. and we ll get the sausage in about 36 hours probably. you re not going to like this deal because it s going to be so short term, but i guarantee we re going to get one. it would be political suicide not to get a deal, and everybody knows that. you know, i mean, that s probably true. but you do have a lot of lawmakers in the congress suggesting that maybe the deadline s not real, maybe they don t have to pay all the debts at once. they can just do the interest.
this is pure politics. the reason you know with certainty that this is going to get worked out, is the market itself. you can look at the two year, the ten year, the 30 year, and if anybody thought that there was not going to be a deal, it would be trading in double digit yields. the market would have already fielded out and figured out that this would be a very bad outcome. that s not the case. you have the nasdaq heading new highs, and people are very optimistic unemployment, so this is a bump in the road. politics at its best is a classic washington d. c. don t watch the sausage being made. just eat the sausage. and we will get the sausage and about 36 hours probably. you are not going to like this deal because it will be so short term, but i guarantee we will get one. it would be political suicide not to get a deal. everybody knows that. that s probably true, but you do have a lot of lawmakers in the congress suggesting that maybe that deadline is not real. maybe they don t have
i m just wondering, do voters say they ve been turned off by the sausage-making process? because it hasn t been cute. yeah. it s complicated, right? but that s what american that s how american policy is made. the democratic party is a large tent. we re not limited to a small segment of society the way many republicans view the world. and we have some good deliberation and some good arguments within our family and we figured it out. i think this is this is good news for the american people and i think we re going to see some really impactful changes for working-class americans. let me ask you one more sausage-making question. as you see at the bottom, senate aims to pass biden s social bill before christmas. my question is do your constituents care when build back better gets passed? are they focused on the end of the year or are they focused on just get this thing passed?