didn t. the reason is that we went into afghanistan in 2002 remain valid today. if any actions that have been taken in recent weeks render a military solution to that problem and possible, then we have to have a non military solution. what does she see that non military solution as being? i what does she see that non-military solution as being? solution as being? i would say to the rirht solution as being? i would say to the right honourable solution as being? i would say to the right honourable gentleman, j solution as being? i would say to. the right honourable gentleman, i solution as being? i would say to - the right honourable gentleman, i am going to make a reference later on to this issue. i think it is, he is absolutely right that the question of a military solution has not been there for some time actually because our combat mission ended some years ago. but what we have been doing is trying to provide the support to enable a democratic government to actually take proper co
was to demonstrate that we can be counted on when it matters. in the integrated review, there werejust two passing references to afghanistan. two passing references. the review didn t even mention the taliban. it didn t even mention the taliban. it didn t even mention the taliban. it didn t mention nato withdrawal or the consequences of the doha agreement. it did cut the size of the army and we criticised it at the time. the size of the army and we criticised it at the time. size of the army and we criticised it at the time. the question is why was the prime it at the time. the question is why was the prime minister it at the time. the question is why was the prime minister so - it at the time. the question is why i was the prime minister so careless? why did he feel to lead? mr speaker, it comes down to complacency and