Martha thats our story for this tuesday night, we will you back here tomorrow. Tucker carlson is up next in washington. Good night, everybody,. Tucker a good evening and welcome to the Tucker Carlson tonight. Midterm elections are just months away and no matter what you hear, the truth is democrats do have a strong chance of taking over the house of representatives if history is any guide. Short term that means that nancy pelosi will get unfettered subpoena power and maxing water is likely to be chairman of the Financial Services committee. But more broadly it means an ascendant Democratic Party, not the party you grew up with but a new and more radical and far more tolerant version of that party. How radical . Let me show you the violence. Tucker might as well give them real socialism, the crowd cheers. Just ten years ago democrats and nodded to the idea of border security. They said there were for it. Now the idea of immigration and enforcement of any kind, of borders themselves, is
with different attitudes towards women, for example. and sweden has changed more than any other european country. what is going on now in those cities is a disaster. the mass arson that has taken place at the prime minister said on a coordinated basis. huge levels in the rise in crime for example. all of that caused by a government policies. and i tell you on the 9th of september there was a swedish general election, and with the will run is shock, surprise, as the far right does well in sweden. well, all of this has been caused by politicians. tucker: what i guess i m confused by is the lack of curiosity on the part of the left in the united states, the party of science which you think would be interested in an empirical inquiry into the results of swedish and immigration policy. we are following the same course, why wouldn t we be interested in the outcomes? but we are not. in fact we punish anyone who is
tucker: the heart of english civilization was hit by another terror attack, the 29-year-old man rammed his vehicle into cyclists and pedestrians in the center of london. people were injured but thankfully no one was killed. meanwhile in sweden, at least 80 cars were torched in several cities and with the prime minister says were extremely organized attack. no motives have been identified for either attack. for decades violence like this was basically unheard of. now thanks to deliberate policy choices by those in power, that has changed radically. the question is are we free to describe what s happening. nigel fled the democratic party, and thanks for joining us. it s not even worth it seems to me speculating about what could happen here. i don t have all the facts and i don t want to get out on a limb but here s what we do know indisputably. ancient societies in europe and
tucker: we ve established that you think trump is bad. trump is okay. we try to be the one show that doesn t talk about trump for the entire hour, so let me restate the question. why is it so hard for democratic leaders to stand up for an established principle of the democratic party, one that i grew up with, that we should attack people on the basis of skin color? i m hearing them of all levels, they attacked fellow americans for their skin color. that s immoral. why does nobody say so? i don t think every democratic leader has to respond to every kook. and i don t think we are looking at elected officials who are attacking people tucker: really? the new york times editorial writer, who was at the center of this huge controversy, she attacked people for their skin color. she was roundly defended by left-wing pundits on other channels, it s not a good thing to attack people on the basis of characteristics they can t control, nobody said that. anyone who tried to say that wa
civil war was aims to address the problems of post-civil war s slavery. nobody really drafted that law and dreamed of that we would have 4 million people with foreign nationals. it s kind of murky and we have about 150 years of jurisprudence that can t quite adjudicate adt that meant. but what that can do tucker is we are the only real people that can go here with the exception of canada that allows both tourism or people to become citizens as parents if they are not only not parents but they are not here illegally. they do not do it and it s mostly a new world phenomenon. at that only applies to the united states because that s what people want to come. it s something that s archaic and i think we could modify it, we could say in five years we