conference? that took all of us covering the white house some time to figure out. because we were all going through the transcript of sherrod brown and mayor, the mayor s press conference, trying to figure out what that was, and finally we had to get from stefanie grisham the press secretary, essentially saying that she felt they the mayor and the senator should have emphasized how happy everyone in the hospital was to see the president, and that they did not characterize the enthusiasm at the hospital like that is one of the most important things to be conveyed out of the visit. you know, so it was a very odd tweet to see, that left us scratching our heads but it did fit into a pattern of a very odd day. when you step back and look at this through a political lens, and i will do that, because my brain kind of lives in 2020, as the baeincumbent president, the advantage you have as the office of the presidency, where you can look presidential, you can look
explode. the united states faces a national security threat from russia in this regard, and he s out there today saying you really think russia attacked us, you really think it hacked into the dnc and influenced the election, or tried to intervene? and everybody says yes. and yet, republican party enables him, and supports him, in they don t nile of reality. so michael, let s work through this, because this may be unimportant, or it may be something in two years we re talking about. ian, the press secretary for the harris campaign, tweeted a quote from an nbc news article in february in response to this hashtag we re talking about, kamala harris destroyed hash tag, and reporters writing their stories with eyes on the modern day assignment desk of twitter, read this. the russia propaganda machine that tried to influence the 2016 election is now promoting the presidential aspirations of a controversial hawaii democrat.
mitch mcconnell is blocking key bills. i mean at some point, i just don t know when heads begin to explode. the united states faces a national security threat from russia in this regard, and he s out there today saying you really think russia attacked us, you really think it hacked into the dnc and influenced the election, or tried to intervene? and everybody says yes. and yet, republican party enables him, and supports him, in they don t nile of reality. so michael, let s work through this, because this may be unimportant, or it may be something in two years we re talking about. ian, the press secretary for the harris campaign, tweeted a quote from an nbc news article in february in response to this hashtag we re talking about, kamala harris destroyed hash tag, and reporters writing their stories with eyes on the modern day assignment desk of twitter, read this.
a great job they re buried the love of the people in the u.k., the queen and others when we went to that state visit was incredible. we heard it from so many people in the ground who said they ve never seen someone interact with the president with the queen that way. they ve never seen her engage in such a long conversation, had such a good relationship, so we want to use that relationship to build our partnership with the u.k. and we will continue to do that and all the world are starting to see what we know about iran, which the obama administration ignored. they had been aggressors in his world for a long time. if they are doing it, they ve done it to the u.k. and now we have an even stronger partnership in the fight. martha: the press secretary, head of communications for the white house. we haven t seen a press briefing, are we going to see one anytime soon? i m sure. that decision is always up to the president but let s keep in mind, the press secretary, the comms director,
he didn t call me senator he called me son. he changed the story. i don t know why. and made it a lot worse. and now he s got to own it. here s my question, to what the president is saying. i asked senator sanders about this. he said that the vice president needs to apologize. that s his position. he didn t change it. but you ll be running against somebody in the general who doesn t give a damn about who calls who boy and whatever it is. they may have passed the first step act. any of this thought about sensitive language and playing to issues of generational trama. and how we deal with it going forward or reparations. you ll get no love in the general from this president or anyone who is voting for him. what happens if you wind up injuring potentially your best choices? like what it sanders steps in it and gets taken to task and gets beaten up. your best choices to beat the president in the general are out in the primary. are you worried about that? i don t subscribe to that. it s h