shouldn t get the grand jury materials. well, what world are they living in? during the nixon impeachment we got grand jury materials and we got it with the approval of the court. that s a precedent that s there for 45 years. what are they talking about? i guess this is just like the new trump supreme court they throw out all precedent, disregard history, don t know what they re talking about but that s what we see with the justice department here and it s highly political and it s wrong. let the house do its work. you know, nobody knows the outcome of an inquiry. they don t know whether it s going to be whether there are going to be any grounds for impeachment. i personally think there are x but maybe they ll decide they aren t after they do a thorough investigation. then maybe they ll decide as we did actually in the nixon impeachment, there was several articles of impeachment that were proposed. i drafted one of them and they were rejected. does that mean you have to drop the whol
ridiculous, let the judiciary committee do its work. the justice department may be creating enough confusion so that judges may try to hold back. hope they don t because i think that impeachment is something the framers really wanted to protect the democracy and the court shouldn t stop that process. a serious dlib rative process from going forward. i think you made the point that i really wanted to touch on you quickly. the i think what a lot of people are afraid of and what they worry about is that the reason that william barr can make these assertions that donald trump has so stacked the courts including the supreme court with kavanaugh replacing kennedy. they that are confident that they can make what are absurd arguments that are ahistorical when it comes with the impeachment inquiry against nixon, but they re comfort if it goes all the way they ve got a vote locked down with gorsuch