c. circuit, the nation s second highest court, just a couple of days ago. i expect that court is going to throw out trump s claims really quickly, and trump has always been hoping united states supreme court will get that case and stopped his trial pending it. i m just not sure that s right. there is so little to trump s claims that it is perfectly plausible to think u.s. supreme court s not gonna hear the case and not going to delay trump s trial. so much fourth or thereabouts can still occur. andrew, what do you still see when you have this trial calendar? the same reaction as neal listening to the argument, and particularly judge pan take apart the argument. many ways just getting the lawyer to actually say what they are arguing because it was so preposterous. so the more that argument went on, the more you thought, i think, as neal does that the odds of the supreme court saying, you know what? don t need to hear this. what you are arguing is just so preposterous. it doesn t mea
so he is not leaving stones unturned. he is going and saying, for example, boy, it looks like this attorney isn t expensing legal advice or being asked to dispense legal advice. we re going to go to the court. we re going to pierce attorney-client privilege. jack smith brought that case all the way up to the d.c. circuit, the nation s second highest court. they agreed with him that the attorney-client privilege doesn t shield these materials. so he s been meticulous on that. that s different than being an aggressive prosecutor general. you are throwing the book at someone. you know, if smith wanted to do that here, for example, he could have easily indicted in washington, d.c. and yet, you know, trump s lawyers would have made a would have tried to argue something about that and tried to make a mess of it, but he would have won that every day of the week. what i think he decided to do is, look, this indictment, where is it occurring? it is mostly occurring in
striking thing and in addition going on in washington, d.c. right now is what we have just been discussing that the nation s second highest court has ruled against donald trump s attempt to try and block the testimony of senior white house officials. this is a panel that included a very prominent trump appointed judge. it is a 3-0 decision trump tried to assert executive privilege, just as last year he lost that in the supreme court 8-1. he lost it here 3-0. they can try and take this to the united states supreme court, but my strong, strong educated guess here is it is going nowhere and going nowhere fast that show is going to get on the road we re looking now not only at trump facing now he s been arrested in new york, for two different federal criminal investigations against him, going on in washington for the stolen documents as well as january 6th. and there is what is going on in
and most of all, trump s already lost the same executive privilege claim, 8 to 1, in the u.s. supreme court. just last year. so, it s going nowhere. trump will try and use this for months of delay, i don t think it s gonna work. the nation s second highest court, the d.c. circuit, where this appeal is being lodged, just last week, gave trump about six hours, or the government about six hours, to respond to trump s appeal and denied the whole thing within 24 hours. i suspect, maybe not that fast of a timetable, but a very, very fast time table, lawrence, federal judges are getting increasingly upset by trump s delay tactics. so, this one maybe not measured in hours, more like days. still, very quick. they have become impatient. dan horowitz, speaking of impatient, i know the audience, i know i speak for them when i say, i have been waiting all day for you to explain to me what is going on on the calendar of the manhattan grand
president, not the former one. so, that s biden and biden s already said no executive privilege. the supreme court has also said, executive privilege can be pieced pierced by criminal wrongdoing, which is of course, the case when it comes to january 6th. and most of all, trump s already lost the same executive privilege claim, 8 to 1, in the u.s. supreme court. just last year. so, it s going nowhere. trump will try and use this for months of delay, i don t think it s gonna work. the nation s second highest court, the d. c. circuit, where this appeal is being lodged, just last week, gave trump about six hours, or the government about six hours, to respond to trump s appeal and denied the whole thing within 24 hours. i suspect, maybe not that fast of a timetable, but a very, very fast time table, lawrence, federal judges are getting increasingly upset by trump s delay tactics. so, this one maybe not measured in hours, more like days. still, very quick. they have become impatient. dan