i remain skeptical i actually things have bee inverted a bit i want to get your reactio because you worked a manhattan da s office under morgan thought, whose two t.a.s ago the da between bragg and morgan, had said this and make the press, interestingly there was a federal case in th southern district it was not produced, purse pursued by the manhattan da here s what he had to say abou that take a listen. i want to get into th deliberations that might b covered by the grand jur material, but as i believe you know, i was asked by the u.s attorney s office and th southern district to stand dow on our investigation, which ha commenced, involve the trump organization and as, you know, as someone who respects that office a great deal, and believing that they may have perhaps the best laws to investigate, i did so. it seems to remain to m that the feds asked and th manhattan da da to say - why now? we all know it s not th exact same investigation we have different prosecutors,
thinks all attention is good and i think a lot of peopl have come to believe that he s correct about that, probably because of 2016. i remain skeptical i actually things have bee inverted a bit i want to get your reactio because you worked a manhattan da s office under morgan thought, whose two d. a. s ago the da between bragg and morgan, vance had said this on meet th press, interestingly there was a federal case in th southern district it was not produced, purse pursued by the manhattan da here s what he had to say abou that take a listen. i want to get into th deliberations that might b covered by the grand jur material, but as i believe you know, i was asked by the u.s attorney s office and th southern district to stand dow on our investigation, which ha commenced, involve the trump organization and as, you know, as someone who respects that office a great deal, and believing that they may have perhaps the best laws to investigate, i did so. it seems to remain to m that the fed
this particular moment as he s i this particular moment as he s running this particular moment as he s running the this particular moment as he s running the present this particular moment as he s running the present again - this particular moment as he s running the present again and | this particular moment as he s i running the present again and hit that criminal running the present again and hit that criminal live running the present again and hit that criminal live wire running the present again and hit that criminal live wire is - running the present again and hit i that criminal live wire is something pretty that criminal live wire is something pretty spectacular that criminal live wire is something pretty spectacular to that criminal live wire is something pretty spectacular to see that criminal live wire is something pretty spectacular to see and i that criminal live wire is something pretty spectacular to see and not . that criminal live wire is somethingj pr
he paid through michael cohe the hush money, which is a serious offense according to federal prosecutors, tha imperils our democracy so people who are saying it is just a hush money campaign violations game, no, that is not what the federal prosecutors who sent michael cohen to prison, and they said he was directed to do what h did by donald trump. why did the federal prosecutor jump to that conclusion? from evidence. i am saying to everyone, kee your powder dry, e is presumed innocent, but this jury is going to get a lot of evidence to back up with david pecker and michael cohen say and then inches up to the jury to decid beyond a reasonable doubt. have your michael cohen being contacted, today, by the manhattan da s office? i cannot tell you about those contacts i can t tell you the answe that i will say that in the recen days i was struck by the level of detail of the questions and answers that michael had t provide, down to the