minister that actually, he i on and he convinced the prime minister that actually, he wasl on and he convinced the prime i minister that actually, he was going to invade minister that actually, he was going to invade ukraine, minister that actually, he was going to invade ukraine, and minister that actually, he was going to invade ukraine, and that - minister that actually, he was going to invade ukraine, and that meant i to invade ukraine, and that meant britain, to invade ukraine, and that meant britain, before to invade ukraine, and that meant britain, before any to invade ukraine, and that meant britain, before any other - to invade ukraine, and that meant britain, before any other country i to invade ukraine, and that meantl britain, before any other country in the world, britain, before any other country in the world, sent britain, before any other country in the world, sent the britain, before any other country in the world, sent the crucial- britain, before any
want to punish those who are bringing in the invaders. and who used the word invasion several times in his manifesto? the new zealand shooter. and on friday, president trump had an opportunity to show that he was not pathetic, spineless, impotent, weak in the face of domestic terrorists, white supremacists, and what word did he use, anderson? invaders. invasion. any reason why he s seen as the renewed symbol of white identity and a man who shares common purpose with not only the new zealand shooter, but also the daily stormer, the leading white supremacist website? a l alt-right, david duke of the kk. it s all there. after the attacks, you wrote, the threat we re facing isn t just individual terrorists, it s the global ideology of white nationalism and white supremacy. we have to take it seriously and call out academics and media personalities who give it a platform. i mean, i think back even to i think it was one of the last campaign commercials, if not the last campaign com
president received by his choice of words yesterday? should it had come directly from the president? one thing we know about donald trump is that he shares his feelings with us. he attacks mitch mcconnell. he attacks the new york times. he attacks friends and foes whenever he feels strongly about soing. and we can also see what he doesn t do. so the fact that he could not bring himself, not for the first time to condemn white nationalists and neo-nazis and the kkk is purposeful. it s not an accident. it s not an oversight. so then the white house comes out with a statement saying, of course when he condemns violence it includes violence perpetuated by the kk, nazis and white nationalists. he has never been shy before telling us what s on his mind. any statement that doesn t dprum him, from his little tweeting fingers really means nothing. it s like someone trying to provide political cover for him.
individuals who chose to remain and cause violence. > martha: so that was a sentiment that the president was criticized for. today though he called for the nation to come together and in that statement, he named names. to anyone who acted criminally in this weekend s racist violence, you will be held fully accountable. justice will be delivered. racism is evil. and those who cause violence in its name are criminals and thugs. including the kk, neo nazis, white supremacists and other hate groups that are repugnant to everything we hold dear as americans. as a candidate i promised to restore law and order to our country. and our federal law enforcement agencies are following through on that pledge. martha: a lot of developments on all sides on this tonight. now the mother of the woman, heather hare who was killed
different stance on that. it s quote. the president has no constitutional authority to take this nation to war unless we are attacked or unless there is proof we are about to be attacked. that was back in 2007. when i look back at the quotes from the president from the interview he did with crisco mow . he kk its suggests there is a military interest breached in the big picture. is he lay be the ground worker to his justification. there is not a lot of american interest in syria. you have al qaeda on one side, you have hamas and iranian-backed terrorist groups fighting on behalf of the assad regime. he s saying that to try to get more support. but when you look at the comments as a candidate based on now, it s always easier to be