in a surprise hearing this week, cassidy hutchinson, the former trump aide to chief of staff mark meadows, delivered to our stunning testimony to the january six committee. hutchinson took us inside the white house in the days leading up to and on january the six. as trump and his inner circle carried out their campaign to overturn our election. hutchison testified that repeated warnings of violence on that day were simply ignored by trump and other white house officials, including her boss. was it your understanding that mr. ornado told the president about weapons at the rally on the morning of january the six? that is what mr. are not related to me. here is how you characterized mr. meadows general response when people raised general concerns about what could happen on january six. so at the time and the days leading up to the six, there were lots of reports about how things might go bad on the six, even potential for violence. if i am hearing correctly, it seems to
in a surprise hearing this week, cassidy hutchinson, the former trump aide to chief of staff mark meadows, delivered to our stunning testimony to the january six committee. hutchinson took us inside the white house in the days leading up to and on january the six. as trump and his inner circle carried out their campaign to overturn our election. hutchison testified that repeated warnings of violence on that day were simply ignored by trump and other white house officials, including her boss. was it your understanding that mr. ornado told the president about weapons at the rally on the morning of january the six? that is what mr. are not related to me. here is how you characterized mr. meadows general response when people raised general concerns about what could happen on january six. so at the time and the days leading up to the six, there
not. we will dive into the case that is threatening the foundation of our democracy. and are trump cronies tampering with witnesses interviewed by the generals committee? i am ayman mohyeldin, let s get started. the generals committee abortion rights are on the ballot come this november. impose rule america, as abortion access shifts from the federal government to the states, it cannot be understated, americans arrived to an abortion in these places like michigan, wisconsin, and arizona, could soon be in the hands of republican candidates, running on platforms to ban or severely limit abortion. pennsylvania s currently run by a democrat, democrat governor tumble, he s pledged to protect women s rights to abortion. but his
the effect of, you heard it path, he thinks mike deserves it, he does not think they are doing anything wrong. doesn t think they are doing anything wrong. one person had some idea of how wrong everything was. mark meadows. hutchinson revealed that her boss asked for a pardon following the events of january six. meadows has since denied asking for the pardon, but we should make this important note, cassidy hutchinson testified to that under oath. mark meadows has not. let s discuss this with cynthia alksne, a former federal prosecutor in the civil rights division of the justice department and glenn kirschner, also a former prosecutor. luckily for us, they are both msnbc legal analysts. it s good to have both of you with us. you have been helping us near the ship through all the hearings. cynthia, i d like to start with you. your top line reaction to cassidy hutchinson s testimony and what it means for the committee as it goes forward.
an arrest warrant. you present it to a federal judge, and you look up the person or people who are tampering with witnesses because that is interfering with the integrity of this investigation. that is what the fbi should be doing right now. cynthia, what about mark meadows and all this, what is his possible legal exposure post hutchinson testimony. mark meadows at this point should just be taking the fifth amendment. mark meadows has a huge problem. because the committee knows who is supposedly this intermediary, who mark meadows had called her and witness tempered. there s any way that they can prove through the intermediary, or if he made any of the other calls that were tempering, and he has a huge problem, witnessed tempering is a 20-year phony. as well, it should be, because