lawsuit, from his ex book, or abby grossberg who alleged rapid sexism, antisemitic behavior that was running wild on his show. and, then he s also got this legal notice from ray abs, that he made part of his central january six conspiracy theory, during honest program. so, there s all this litigation that s got carlson s name over. it and, you have the dominion lawsuit. and so, it seems as though fox, at some point said, enough is enough, we re going to fire him from the network. and, so we know now that loughlin, murdaugh, fox corporation ceo, as well as suzanne scott, the fox news ceo, they made the decision to let him go, and on monday morning, that s one carlson was abruptly informed that he was no longer with the network. they put out that short statement, and i should note too, we haven t heard a word from carlson since it all went down. we texted him. we call them. he s not answering me. he is not answering anyone
quote journalism there. and it just has proven to be true. no true. it has proven to be a lie, over and over again. he would call into various show and comment about them, he would talk to suzanne scott, the fox news ceo, and he was intimately involved with handling this nonsense. and no just that, he has been intimately involved, for decades, in pulling the wool over peoples eyes. and for showing a turn complet contempt for its audience. look, like most people in new york media, they have bee approached by murdoch types fo jobs over the years. and the degree to which they sho contempt for their audience an call them rubes, and called th morons behind closed doors i jaw-dropping, and i neve thought i would see the da where that actually came t light. and it has already in the trial that hasn t even started.
the time, the energy and the effort to bring people up out of that is a lot and it requires a a a a lot. now on top of the challenges i mentioned stakeholders craw thus system have competing incentives and trace, i ve covered this this struggle for a number of years and often it feels leak not everyone s working towards the same goal. i think people would be shocked you told them they legally cannot go and take these encampments down. every time people learn that they re like what in the aworld. thank you. mean time the fox news at 9 common dense partment just checked the calendar town it s been four years since gavin newton put a moratorium on the death penalty and many of the state s inmates have been moved off death row. murdered convicted before june 51990 could be set free all together and common sense would
weeks, and those include people like sean hannity, tucker carlson, but also maria bartiromo. suzanne scott, the fox news ceo, fox news president j. wallace fox news host bret bear and a list of other star personalities and high ranking executive at the company. now we ll see if fox news allows some of these people to testify . they have signaled that they do want to call people themselves like suzanne scott, the fox news ceo to the stand, obviously, for very different reasons than why dominion would want to call them and foxes a shirt to ah, the present legal challenges to dominion calling some of these witnesses. we don t know how the judge will rule on this, but this is for sure shaping up well to be a very high profile trial in a few weeks. $0.6 billion lawsuit against fox any chance sarah that rupert murdoch himself could be called to testify. well that s the big question right now. wolf the judge said that he
face criminal charges. it s a big, big risk for the prosecutor to do this. of all of the investigations of donald trump, you could argue that this one is the least serious. there is the classified documents. there s the effort to overturn the 2020 election. and then this is hush money to a porn star, alleged. so, i think that there is a risk. if you are going to charge an ex-president and a current presidential candidate, you have to know that your case is pretty solid. and there are questions raised about this is a novel legal theory that has never been tested in court. and, you know, the prosecutor is taking some risks here. bret: yeah, foxnews.com, the opinion sudden turn of events that could derail trump s indictment indictment. this is by gregg jarrett the fox news legal analyst. according to costello who you heard from the bump-in shot. no april of 2018 repeated that the stormy daniels payment was continued to protect the president s wife not the