they are going after gay rights. all these other things. the fear-mongering. what is the legal position there? is there anything in this draft ruling that would seriously threaten what the democrats are strieg trying to to scare people about. any right created by a judiciary can be uncreated by the same body. if you don t amend the constitution, you don t actually have that right. that s why liberals when they want to scare you talk about brown versus board of education. it was the understanding all the way through from the civil war forward that the 14th amendment did not prohibit segregation but they interpreted in the 1950s that it did mean that liberty included the right to not attend segregated schools. it was interpreted in.
they are going after gay rights. all these other things. the fear-mongering. what is the legal position there? is there anything in this draft ruling that would seriously threaten what the democrats are strieg trying to to scare people about. any right created by a judiciary can be uncreated by the same body. if you don t amend the constitution, you don t actually have that right. that s why liberals when they want to scare you talk about brown versus board of education. it was the understanding all the way through from the civil war forward that the 14th amendment did not prohibit segregation but they interpreted in the 1950s that it did mean that liberty included the right to not attend segregated schools. it was interpreted in.
all these other things. the fear-mongering. what is the legal position there? is there anything in this draft ruling that would seriously threaten what the democrats are strieg trying to to scare people about. any right created by a judiciary can be uncreated by the same body. if you don t amend the constitution, you don t actually have that right. that s why liberals when they want to scare you talk about brown versus board of education. it was the understanding all the way through from the civil war forward that the 14th amendment did not prohibit segregation but they interpreted in the 1950s that it did mean that liberty included the right to not attend segregated schools. it was interpreted in.
adjudicate on every aspect of american life to tell us what we can and cannot do. do you know what the cdc recommends that you don t be eat any meat medium rare? that s one of their guidelines? we have got to take things into consideration but it s too complicated. it s too paternalistic and we have got to get back to very simple messaging like we have for every other respiratory pathogen, if you have been exposed, stay your distance. if you are around someone vulnerable, be careful. if you are sick, stay home. keep it simple and we can get through this without hyper screening everybody, creating a testing shortage by telling everybody to get tested and having a limited supply and driving people into this mass confusion. lawrence: the advice that you have just given on this program is one that can you simply put on the postcard. i think average day people, reasonable people say okay, i can do that. the fear-mongering, the changing of the science, that fits the
how they described crime and, yes, there is a crime problem. but the way it s described on fox you would be afraid to leave your house. a lot of the fear-mongering is about the things that are not actually morality threats and ignoring the things that are morality threats. instead immigrant hoards and senile president and critical race theory brainwashing your kids and things that are, you know, if it not just exsass gear rated invented out of whole cloth. jesse: murder rates. virginia electing youngkin governor to fix the schools never happened. nothing to worry, about america. the only thing you should worry about is me. fox news announced today jesse watters will be the host of the 7:00 p.m. hour. what does it say to you that that man is now one of the main faces of fox news on prime time. john, i can t imagine. ark of fox news is bending toward more clown car and recklessness and extremism.